We performed a comparison between Neo4j Graph Database and SQL Server based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about MongoDB, Couchbase, InfluxData and others in NoSQL Databases."Creates the ability to visualize outputs."
"Enables people to understand what the business problem is and how the technology helps."
"As a graph database, I am surprised at their performance and response time."
"It is a very user-friendly solution. It is easy to manage the databases and troubleshoot any issue. It is a perfect solution for the volume or transactions that we need to manage."
"The product's initial setup phase was simple."
"It is fairly easy to work with. I like the high-availability options, like mirroring for example, and the high-availability groups."
"The most valuable aspect is the ability to utilize jobs and various functions to accomplish specific tasks, which cannot be achieved with standard procedures alone. This allows for a combination of features and functionalities to be employed."
"This solution is user-friendly and easy to understand."
"The product has very good online documentation that can be used for troubleshooting."
"They have improved the UI and ease of accessing the database and server which is good. You can load it up and start using it from the very minute it is implemented."
"It is easy to manage for the administrator. It is also easy to use for applications that are Windows-based. It is a very stable product, and it has got backup and recovery tools."
"So far, we have not had any issues and are happy with the product in general."
"There are concerns about performance and whether the tool can necessarily scale to provide the solution."
"I would like to see more integration with other products and it needs to be more secure."
"The performance could be better."
"Our biggest problem with SQL Server is latency. The communication between the cloud and the on-premises environment is slow. The data needs to be encrypted for security, and you have to exchange data certificates between environments. You can adjust the configuration to improve performance, but it would be nice if SQL Server had some templates to resolve problems."
"Linux-based editions are not yet proven to be on par with Windows deployments."
"When we run into problems, it's usually during installation, and finding answers to the problem has been a nightmare because the documentation is terrible."
"SQL Server is an expensive solution"
"The solution’s pricing and integration could be improved."
"We have had problems implementing a data warehouse using SQL Server."
Neo4j Graph Database is ranked 7th in NoSQL Databases with 3 reviews while SQL Server is ranked 1st in Relational Databases Tools with 260 reviews. Neo4j Graph Database is rated 8.4, while SQL Server is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Neo4j Graph Database writes "Lots of training and documentation and excellent performance". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SQL Server writes "Easy to use and provides good speed and data recovery". Neo4j Graph Database is most compared with MongoDB, Cassandra, SingleStore and ScyllaDB, whereas SQL Server is most compared with MariaDB, SAP HANA, Oracle Database, LocalDB and IBM Db2 Database.
We monitor all NoSQL Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.