We performed a comparison between Nexusguard DDoS Protection and Radware DefensePro based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) Protection solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The managed service allows us to confidently rely on Nexusguard’s professional team to take relevant actions as and when required to make sure DDoS attacks are successfully mitigated, ensuring 100% uptime of our service."
"Cloud Diversion is another good feature packaged with the whole solution. When attack traffic is detected, Cloud Diversion triggers to automatically route our prefix to Nexusguard’s scrubbing center, ensuring that all attack traffic is dropped in the shortest time possible."
"Filters can be customized depending on the characteristics of the attack traffic. This feature has made it easier for Nexusguard's SOC team to further isolate any specific attack that can't be blocked by pre-configured mitigation."
"The support team was helpful."
"Based on the support received for implementation, I rate the solution's technical support a nine out of ten."
"It offers valuable insights into ongoing and past attacks, aiding in post-incident analysis and continuous improvement of our cybersecurity strategy."
"The DDoS protection that the solution provides is its most valuable feature."
"It has not gone down for a quite long time. It's working fine."
"All of our traffic has to pass through the appliance, so we can very quickly mitigate the attack. This is a very valuable feature. On top of that, it's not only volumetric attack protection that the solution offers, but also layer 7 attack protection as well."
"It has kept us up and operational on a day-to-day basis, without being interrupted by an attack from outside sources."
"This solution is extremely scalable and has the highest level throughput (100G) which complies with Telco deployment."
"Its functionality is very good."
"They have a hybrid model approach if a client wants to go that way."
"There was a certain level of performance degradation in the solution, which I don't know if it can be tuned...In my experience, it is an area that can be improved while also considering the stability and scalability aspects of the solution."
"The solution must provide features for the post-processing of the traffic type and the traffic quality."
"The mitigation scope of Origin Protection is not fully efficient as there could be delays in activating the countermeasures."
"One of the features that should be added to the next release is report generation. Currently, reports can be downloaded every month and are only available at the beginning of each month. It would be nice to generate the reports based on specific dates that we prefer and not have to wait until the next month for the current month’s report."
"One thing that we would like to improve from them is to provide more training to SOC team for them to have a deep understanding of the solution so that they would always be ready to answer anything without the need to escalate queries to senior personnel."
"They should add artificial intelligence to the platform. It is currently missing the machine learning piece."
"The solution is a little more pricey than other options on the market."
"The dashboard could be updated."
"If they would go to a cloud-based approach, that would give much more flexibility in terms of working with them."
"This solution may not cover all of the requirements in situations for which I am unfamiliar, and there is always room for improvement."
"It could incorporate more intelligence for reacting with web site visitors."
"I would like to have more granular steps according to protected bandwidth, so the granularity should be better."
"As a service provider, we are expecting the multi-tenancy feature on the dashboard and reporting side. It will help share reports with customers in real-time. They can directly see them online. We are working with their team on API integration with our portal. We will be able to achieve that, but it will take some time."
Nexusguard DDoS Protection is ranked 13th in Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) Protection with 5 reviews while Radware DefensePro is ranked 5th in Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) Protection with 22 reviews. Nexusguard DDoS Protection is rated 9.4, while Radware DefensePro is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Nexusguard DDoS Protection writes "A solution requiring straightforward maintenance while remaining cost-effective compared to its competitors in the market". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Radware DefensePro writes "Regular signature update with good reporting and analytics". Nexusguard DDoS Protection is most compared with Cloudflare, Arbor DDoS, Corero, Cloudflare DDoS and Imperva DDoS, whereas Radware DefensePro is most compared with Arbor DDoS, Cloudflare, Imperva DDoS, Fortinet FortiDDoS and Check Point DDoS Protector. See our Nexusguard DDoS Protection vs. Radware DefensePro report.
See our list of best Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) Protection vendors.
We monitor all Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) Protection reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.