We performed a comparison between OpenESB and Oracle Service Bus based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, MuleSoft, Software AG and others in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB)."OpenESB pushes the organization to clearly define service boundaries and interfaces. So it motives the business and the development teams to clearly define their business services and processes they want to implement. OpenESB supports fine and coarse-grain granularity for the services and supports top-down and bottom-up approaches for the services, processes definition, and composition."
"The core is very stable."
"One of the most valuable features is being able to implement business processes while keeping track of the design from BPMN to a BPEL Implementation."
"The process-oriented solution allows you to define choreography and orchestration."
"Overall it is a pretty good solution."
"Its ease of use is valuable. It's very easy to use. It's no code/low code. Oracle Middleware products are also rich in adapters."
"The stability is consistently high, with only one notable issue encountered."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is that you can connect with different applications."
"We've been pleased with the level of technical support."
"Service Bus is good at routing the transformation."
"Supports multiple protocol technologies and web services."
"The solution is quite stable overall. We haven't witnessed any performance issues so far."
"Regarding its management, a web console being able to synchronize distributed instances would be great."
"The documentation of the product must be improved. It could be tricky to find the right documentation on a topic since the documentation is spread in many places. I advise the new joiner to contact the community to get entry points and additional documentation. Tutorial and Video must be present to take up the product."
"The documentation needs to be better."
"Cloud deployment is weak and needs to be improved."
"There are times when I select components in composite and they do not appear, and I cannot figure out why."
"If they can containerize this, that would be nice. If they can provide docker images and offer support for those containers, that would be great."
"There are some loopholes in service and support."
"Security needs to be more integrated."
"We have faced a problem with the heap memory side, but that is stable now."
"The interface console is very slow. Even in production, we need to increase the RAM or CPU. And even after that, the performance is still not good in production."
"Security features can be improved to better protect the server."
"The support for GraphQL needs to be improved, and the response time for global support could be faster."
OpenESB is ranked 13th in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 4 reviews while Oracle Service Bus is ranked 5th in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 25 reviews. OpenESB is rated 8.6, while Oracle Service Bus is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of OpenESB writes "Enables us to define the business process and integrate it with other software". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Service Bus writes "Enables us to do a lot of aggregation and routing, but API response can be a problem if the payload is heavy". OpenESB is most compared with WSO2 Enterprise Integrator and Mule ESB, whereas Oracle Service Bus is most compared with Mule ESB, IBM Integration Bus, webMethods Integration Server, Red Hat Fuse and Fiorano ESB.
See our list of best Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
