We compared VMware Tanzu Mission Control and OpenShift Container Platform based on our user's reviews in several parameters.
VMware Tanzu Mission Control and OpenShift Container Platform both offer competitive pricing, efficient setup processes, and positive customer service experiences. VMware Tanzu Mission Control is praised for its management capabilities, multi-cloud deployment, and security measures, while OpenShift Container Platform is lauded for its system integration, resource management, and application scalability. Users suggest VMware Tanzu Mission Control could improve on user interface and performance, while OpenShift Container Platform could enhance UI, system performance, resource management, and language support.
Features: VMware Tanzu Mission Control offers comprehensive management capabilities, multi-cloud deployment, resource utilization, user-friendly interface, security measures, and automation. OpenShift Container Platform focuses on integration, resource management, security, customization, and scalability of applications.
Pricing and ROI: The setup cost for VMware Tanzu Mission Control is minimal and straightforward, with no additional complexities. The licensing process is hassle-free and transparent, allowing flexibility for various deployment scenarios. In comparison, the setup process for OpenShift Container Platform is also straightforward and efficient. The licensing model is commended for its flexibility in meeting the needs of different users., In terms of return on investment, VMware Tanzu Mission Control has proven to be valuable for managing and controlling VMware ecosystems. Users reported improved efficiency and resource allocation. On the other hand, OpenShift Container Platform offers significant improvements in resource utilization, scalability, efficiency, and cost savings. It has enabled increased productivity and revenue growth through optimized operations and streamlined workflows.
Room for Improvement: VMware Tanzu Mission Control has room for improvement in terms of user interface, performance, documentation, and customization options. OpenShift Container Platform, on the other hand, could benefit from enhancements in user interface, system performance, resource management, and support for different programming languages.
Deployment and customer support: In comparing the reviews, it can be concluded that the duration to establish a new tech solution with VMware Tanzu Mission Control typically takes one week for both deployment and setup phases, while with OpenShift Container Platform, it can range from one week for both phases to three months for deployment and an additional week for setup. The context in which these terms are used must be carefully evaluated., The customer service for VMware Tanzu Mission Control has been highly praised for being excellent, top-notch, and responsive. Users appreciate the promptness and efficiency of the support team. OpenShift Container Platform also receives positive feedback, with users valuing the promptness, responsiveness, and expertise of the support staff. Overall, users express satisfaction with the customer service experience provided by both platforms.
The summary above is based on 39 interviews we conducted recently with VMware Tanzu Mission Control and OpenShift Container Platform users. To access the review's full transcripts, download our report.
"I have found the ability to scale up is most valuable."
"The best feature is the management for the port life cycle, which automatically recycles, pulls, and scales up and down based on needs and requests."
"Some of the primary features we leverage in the platform have to do with how we manage the cluster configurations, the properties, and the auto-scalability. These are the features that definitely provide value in terms of reducing overhead for the developers."
"Everything is packaged into OpenShift Container Platform."
"The operating system has a live update and is more secure than any other. It's made for Atomic OS, a lightweight OS new to the market. I also like the source-to-image capabilities. The customer can directly deploy their applications from the repository. It's a highly flexible and easy way to deploy into production."
"The solution's security throughout the stack and the software supply chain is very reliable. When it was on-prem, it was by default secured by our company firewalls and security tools, and now it's in the cloud, which has its security and systems in place. This provides stability to our infrastructure."
"More tools are available in OpenShift Container Platform to maintain and manage the clusters."
"On OpenShift, it's easy to scale applications. We can easily scale up or scale down."
"It definitely gives the end customer a good overview and perspective of running applications in terms of overall workload footprint. TMC provides a very detailed description of your cloud-native application in the form of graphical visualization."
"The most important thing about the solution is its flexibility."
"The initial setup is easy."
"The most popular feature of VMware Tanzu Mission Control is its graphical user interface for describing network policies on the Service Mesh, which is highly integrable with other tools commonly used in supply chains such as security."
"The multi-tenancy with the VCD is great."
"Tanzu Mission Control has quite a set of rich features when compared to OpenShift."
"I have multiple Kubernetes environments within my environment. TMC gives me a single pane view, which is good for managing everything."
"VMware Tanzu Mission Control has many valuable features, such as ease of use and customization."
"OpenShift Container Platform could improve by having better integration."
"The product's interface is a bit buggy."
"OpenShift has certain restrictions in terms of managing the cluster when it's running on a public cloud. For example, identity and access management integration with the IM of AWS is quite difficult. It requires some open-source tools to integrate. This is one area where I always see room for improvement."
"The monitoring and logging could be improved."
"The setup process is not great."
"Another thing that bugs me is that they removed the software in NFS storage. I don't understand why because this is a common type of storage. I am having problems with that, so I wish they would put it back."
"It is difficult to deploy the OpenShift cluster in a bare-metal environment."
"It has an option to install OpenShift without connecting it to the Internet. We tried this, but it was very hard. We couldn't manage to use that option. We wanted to use it offline for installations, updates, upgrades, etc., but we didn't find the offline installation and updates easy. This could be better."
"We want to see a new feature that helps build more security architecture like Zero Trust Security or shifting left in Kubernetes."
"Cost is always a concern. Smaller companies might find the price a bigger issue."
"The disaster recovery feature could be improved to provide better tracking of issues. I would also like to see the introduction of a dashboard view, for even further integration of all the areas that Mission Control looks at."
"LYNX is a managed cluster solution that takes care of specific details within a cluster, such as sequences or services. I haven't seen this feature in Tanzu Mission Control."
"This product doesn't have a GUI. In order to use it properly, I need to connect it to a new GUI or build a GUI to manage it — it's pretty difficult."
"The solution could improve by having better integration with other solutions such as HPE."
"The infrastructure is quite challenging."
"Another area of improvement is pricing."
OpenShift Container Platform is ranked 1st in Container Management with 36 reviews while VMware Tanzu Mission Control is ranked 3rd in Container Management with 12 reviews. OpenShift Container Platform is rated 8.2, while VMware Tanzu Mission Control is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of OpenShift Container Platform writes "Provides automation that speeds up our process by 30% and helps us achieve zero downtime". On the other hand, the top reviewer of VMware Tanzu Mission Control writes "Gives a single pane to manage multiple Kubernetes environments and has competitive pricing". OpenShift Container Platform is most compared with Amazon EKS, Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE, Amazon Elastic Container Service, Rancher Labs and Kubernetes, whereas VMware Tanzu Mission Control is most compared with Rancher Labs, Kubernetes, Amazon EKS, Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE and Docker. See our OpenShift Container Platform vs. VMware Tanzu Mission Control report.
See our list of best Container Management vendors.
We monitor all Container Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
