We performed a comparison between Oracle Enterprise Manager and ScienceLogic based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Server Monitoring solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Oracle Enterprise Manager is a scalable solution."
"We use Oracle Enterprise Manager as a tool to monitor Oracle products."
"We can manage everything in our environment."
"The best part is the efficient database performance monitoring and the ability to take actions directly from there."
"What I like most about Oracle Enterprise Manager are its features, particularly the active session history. It provides insights into SQL, and I use it regularly to identify potential issues."
"I have found the singular GUI feature very helpful. Fewer DBA resources can be allocated with Toad licenses."
"It can also help with capacity planning, sizing, and maximizing overall performance in a large scale environment."
"The 13cR2 updates to the OEM family, strongly integrate Cloud (off-site, hybrid and on-premise) services providing a seamless way to see all of your resources regardless of where they are deployed."
"The tool is quite easy to deploy, and it offers very good support."
"The most valuable features of ScienceLogic are AI and machine learning."
"I'm satisfied with ScienceLogicfor for what they can offer today because they can offer both serverless connectivity and agent connectivity."
"It is simple."
"The best feature is the highly flexible graphs."
"It has good monitoring capabilities across cloud environments, data centers, and hybrid environments."
"Power packs."
"Provides agentless monitoring so there's no need to install the agent on each server."
"Oracle Enterprise Manager could improve the monitoring types and the graphics."
"I feel more dashboards can be added, especially those useful to higher levels of IT management."
"They should improve the hover text context. This would provide assistance whenever a task is attempted by a DBA."
"Technical support could be more responsive."
"I would like to see better pricing."
"There's a lot of documentation to go through as a new user."
"Oracle Enterprise Manager's scalability is an area with certain shortcomings where improvements are required."
"The solution is considered expensive."
"There are often bugs in new releases."
"The product's reporting functionalities have certain shortcomings, making it an area where improvements are required."
"It was challenging onboarding users."
"Admins do not have direct access to the reporting."
"ScienceLogic should provide detailed documents to customer as the current documents are not sufficient."
"They need a little more self-service."
"Addressing duplicate IPs: There is the ability to edit the DB and fix this, but adding some logic to understand them would be a plus."
"From a performance perspective, it needs to improve a lot."
Oracle Enterprise Manager is ranked 4th in Server Monitoring with 123 reviews while ScienceLogic is ranked 6th in Server Monitoring with 42 reviews. Oracle Enterprise Manager is rated 8.4, while ScienceLogic is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Oracle Enterprise Manager writes "Provides good stability and has an easy implementation process". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ScienceLogic writes "Great integrations, power flow, and good support". Oracle Enterprise Manager is most compared with Zabbix, Dynatrace, Quest Spotlight, AppDynamics and Quest Foglight for Databases, whereas ScienceLogic is most compared with Dynatrace, LogicMonitor, SolarWinds NPM, Datadog and Zabbix. See our Oracle Enterprise Manager vs. ScienceLogic report.
See our list of best Server Monitoring vendors.
We monitor all Server Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.