We performed a comparison between Oracle Hyperion and Software AG ARIS Process Mining based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Performance Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."We like the reporting and tracking of financials."
"Since it is an enterprise-capable solution, people are not worried about security, giving data, the ability to manage complex consolidation, and its ability to modify reporting."
"The stability is fine and quite user friendly."
"The most valuable features are those associated with modules and SP, IT in this space, planning, HFM, and PME."
"Hyperion is helpful for all our budget processes."
"The scalability is good."
"We have found there is excellent stability with Oracle Hyperion."
"Oracle Hyperion has helped make things work faster in our company."
"I have found Software AG ARIS Process Mining scalable."
"One feature I found really cool was the Conformance Engine."
"The interface is simplified and easy to use."
"It is a stable solution...I rate the technical support a ten out of ten...On a scale of one to ten, where one is difficult, and ten is easy, I rate the setup a nine."
"It is very easy to work on the way the ETL happens in ARIS Process Mining."
"Oracle EPM Cloud solutions have simplified the security model. Nevertheless, it would be better having a more differentiated security model."
"Oracle Hyperion's scalability could be improved."
"What I like is to have everything on one platform and not in different modules like Oracle Hyperion."
"Oracle Hyperion generally it's quite a complex architecture that is hard to maintain."
"The initial setup of Oracle Hyperion is very difficult."
"I have a problem with Hyperion when I need to log some changes in the budget. It's hard to know who made which changes in the budget."
"There can be an improvement in many regards with the dimensions, the metadata, the interfaces, as well as the integration."
"The analytics could be improved."
"When the process models are transferred back to the design environment for further optimization and simulations, we need to see some improvements in the way the models get created in the design."
"I guess we have many unnecessary steps within our processes. There is room for automation and room for enhancement within our application portfolio management...In short, I would like to eliminate unnecessary steps in some processes in this solution."
"Customizing KPIs and building dashboards were not as intuitive as other similar tools."
"There should be a single site for modeling and mining."
"The installation is straightforward, we didn't have any technical issues with installing. However, we needed support to complete the implementation."
More Software AG ARIS Process Mining Pricing and Cost Advice →
Oracle Hyperion is ranked 2nd in Business Performance Management with 49 reviews while Software AG ARIS Process Mining is ranked 14th in Business Performance Management with 6 reviews. Oracle Hyperion is rated 8.0, while Software AG ARIS Process Mining is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Oracle Hyperion writes "A world-class solution that provides a lot of functionality out of the box and also allows you to customize it to meet your needs". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Software AG ARIS Process Mining writes "An easy-to-use interface with quite good learning center and documentation". Oracle Hyperion is most compared with Tableau, Anaplan, IBM Cognos, Oracle HFM and IBM Planning Analytics, whereas Software AG ARIS Process Mining is most compared with Celonis, SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, UiPath Process Mining and Anaplan. See our Oracle Hyperion vs. Software AG ARIS Process Mining report.
See our list of best Business Performance Management vendors.
We monitor all Business Performance Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
