We performed a comparison between Oracle Java DB and SAP HANA based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Relational Databases Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Able to write queries more efficiently and the management of data has become better and easier."
"The additional value of having Java inside the Oracle database is all the security that is applied to an Oracle database will be enforced on Java's stored procedures as well."
"It has a programming language so anything that we require for Selenium is all available there."
"There have been no issues in relation to stability. We've never really had do to any recoveries. It is very stable."
"It's very clever."
"The most valuable feature is automation."
"The solution is stable."
"It's user-friendly so long as you use it frequently."
"It is a stable solution...It is a scalable solution."
"The solution is very stable."
"The most valuable feature of SAP HANA is the modeling of the databases."
"If you want to scale with new processes and new reports, that's fairly easy."
"This is a feature-rich product and I like all of them."
"We have found the solution to be customizable and it is beneficial it comes as a bundled package. Additionally, it is user-friendly."
"SAP HANA's best features are its programmability and extensibility - you can size and shape the software however you need."
"In terms of improvement, I'd like an automation tool that is lower priced. The core prices are very high."
"The solution could be more user-friendly."
"Needs improvement in consistency issues with respect to timeframes."
"The biggest lesson that I have learned from using Oracle products is vendor lock-in."
"The solution should continue to keep updating and improving the Java language."
"It'll be better if Oracle Java supports open source technologies, like Node.js."
"The documentation can be improved in the future."
"In terms of improvement, the speed is not as good as we thought it would be. That is why we are trying different solutions that will be built with different technologies."
"Technical support should be more customer-friendly."
"The initial setup of SAP HANA is complex. We did the implementation of one site, and a global deployment will take another three to four years."
"The installation process could be more straightforward."
"The product is very demanding on memory requirements."
"High availability and disaster recovery are very poor in HANA."
"The user experience should be better. Its user interface is not good. I also don't like the transition concept."
Oracle Java DB is ranked 23rd in Relational Databases Tools with 7 reviews while SAP HANA is ranked 3rd in Relational Databases Tools with 81 reviews. Oracle Java DB is rated 8.2, while SAP HANA is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Oracle Java DB writes "Ability to handle large volumes and data sets but could be more user-friendly". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP HANA writes "Excellent compatibility between modules and the control". Oracle Java DB is most compared with MySQL, Oracle Database, SQL Server, Apache Derby and MariaDB, whereas SAP HANA is most compared with Oracle Database, SQL Server, MySQL, IBM Db2 Database and Apache Spark. See our Oracle Java DB vs. SAP HANA report.
See our list of best Relational Databases Tools vendors.
We monitor all Relational Databases Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.