We performed a comparison between Oracle Java DB and SQL Server based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Relational Databases Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution is stable."
"Able to write queries more efficiently and the management of data has become better and easier."
"It's very clever."
"There have been no issues in relation to stability. We've never really had do to any recoveries. It is very stable."
"The most valuable feature is automation."
"It has a programming language so anything that we require for Selenium is all available there."
"The additional value of having Java inside the Oracle database is all the security that is applied to an Oracle database will be enforced on Java's stored procedures as well."
"The solution is easy to set up."
"Its usability is very good. Its performance is satisfactory."
"SQL Server has good performance. It is one of the best features."
"SQL Server is easy to manage."
"The solution is easy to use."
"The solution offers very high performance."
"It helps with moving the design of the database into reality."
"The solution is very easy to use."
"The biggest lesson that I have learned from using Oracle products is vendor lock-in."
"It'll be better if Oracle Java supports open source technologies, like Node.js."
"The solution could be more user-friendly."
"Needs improvement in consistency issues with respect to timeframes."
"The solution should continue to keep updating and improving the Java language."
"In terms of improvement, I'd like an automation tool that is lower priced. The core prices are very high."
"We have had problems implementing a data warehouse using SQL Server."
"Only one CPU core can be used. Can’t move a database between servers easily. Can’t use triggers."
"The solution is rather expensive."
"Since this is a relational order system, scalability has a limit. If your system is very big, you need bigger servers and you have to spend more money. We scale a system up to a certain level, and then we move or shift data to the warehouse, which is NoSQL. We then do not have any bottleneck in scaling. For using this technique we are happy with it."
"SQL Server could be improved with cheaper licensing because it's very expensive."
"In the next releases, I would only like more enhanced backups and more restore points."
"The user interface and the reporting could also be improved."
"The solution's stability can be improved."
Oracle Java DB is ranked 23rd in Relational Databases Tools with 7 reviews while SQL Server is ranked 1st in Relational Databases Tools with 260 reviews. Oracle Java DB is rated 8.2, while SQL Server is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Oracle Java DB writes "Ability to handle large volumes and data sets but could be more user-friendly". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SQL Server writes "Easy to use and provides good speed and data recovery". Oracle Java DB is most compared with MySQL, Oracle Database, SAP HANA, Apache Derby and MariaDB, whereas SQL Server is most compared with MariaDB, SAP HANA, Oracle Database, LocalDB and IBM Db2 Database. See our Oracle Java DB vs. SQL Server report.
See our list of best Relational Databases Tools vendors.
We monitor all Relational Databases Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.