We performed a comparison between Oracle Warehouse Builder [EOL] and Tungsten RPA based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Informatica, Oracle and others in Data Integration."OpenAPI supported me integrating Oracle Warehouse Builder with DevOps solutions like versioning (CVS, Subversion, and Git), ticket systems (Bugzilla and Jira), and test automatization (HPQC) as well as with professional ALM solutions (HP ALM and IKAN ALM)."
"The ability to script information from websites is most valuable. It also seems to be fairly robust and reasonably easy to manage on a server-based deployment. We have a number of robots operating on the central server."
"The product saves time and resources."
"The pricing of the solution is quite good."
"The most valuable features are workflow and process automation."
"The most valuable feature of Kofax RPA is the simplicity of automating tasks."
"The product provided all the security controls that we asked them."
"You can automate browsing tasks without needing a server connection. The platform provides its browser, allowing you to run anything inside it."
"The flexibility to use already-developed components is really good. You can use it for Excel-related operations and other things."
"Unfortunately, a next release of Oracle Warehouse Builder will not happen but a wide range of customers still use the available features together with the current Oracle 11g or 12c database environments."
"I'd like to see a recording function and a more simple interface."
"Kofax RPA needs to improve integration with SAP and Microsoft. The professional services offered by the tool's team is below par. Its licensing needs to be more modular."
"The process discovery could be a bit better."
"The product has some constraints and performance issues."
"Kofax RPA's UI could be more user-friendly."
"The product should improve desktop automation, which is hard to configure. It needs to have custom connectors. It is the only advantage that Microsoft Power Platform has over Kofax RPA. It has more than 800 custom connectors."
"RPA technology is constantly changing, and sometimes Kofax lags behind."
"Exception handling needs to be improved."
More Oracle Warehouse Builder [EOL] Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Oracle Warehouse Builder [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Data Integration while Tungsten RPA is ranked 12th in Robotic Process Automation (RPA) with 24 reviews. Oracle Warehouse Builder [EOL] is rated 7.0, while Tungsten RPA is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of Oracle Warehouse Builder [EOL] writes "Can be enhanced with extra functionality, but no further support will be given for the solution". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tungsten RPA writes "A stable product that provides end-to-end solutions for different business problems". Oracle Warehouse Builder [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Tungsten RPA is most compared with UiPath, Microsoft Power Automate, Blue Prism, Automation Anywhere (AA) and SAS Data Management.
We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.