We performed a comparison between Palo Alto Networks VM-Series and Trellix Network Detection and Response based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable features are the User ID, URL filtering, and application filtering."
"The most valuable feature is the Posture Assessment."
"The VM series has an advantage over the physical version because we are able to change the sources that the machine has, such as the amount of available RAM."
"A solid operating system with all the necessary data center security features."
"The Palo Alto VM-Series is nice because I can move the firewalls easily."
"Embedding it into my application development lifecycle prevents data loss and business disruption, allowing the adoption to operate at the speed of my AWS Cloud."
"It is very stable. It is fairly easy to use."
"Centralized management is valuable because it allows us to configure settings in one location and apply them across all three locations."
"The server appliance is good."
"The most valuable feature is the view into the application."
"Support is very helpful and responsive."
"It is stable and quite protective. It has a lot of features to scan a lot of malicious things and vulnerabilities."
"The installation phase was easy."
"The product has helped improve our organization by being easy to use and integrate. This saves time, trouble and money."
"The most valuable feature is MVX, which tests all of the files that have been received in an email."
"Its ability to find zero-day threats, malware and anything malicious has greatly improved my customer's organization, especially for protecting the users' browser."
"The reporting part of the product is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"The solution's licensing could be improved, and training should be included before installation."
"In the next release, I would like to see better integration between the endpoints and the firewalls."
"The solution needs to have more easily searchable details or documentation about it online, so it's easier to Google if you have queries."
"The interface is all Java-based. I would prefer an HTML5 interface."
"There is no proper support channel to follow up on cases."
"It'll help if Palo Alto Networks provided better documentation."
"The solution must improve Zero Trust integration and use cases."
"It is very expensive, the price could be better."
"A better depth of view, being able to see deeper into the management process, is what I'd like to see."
"As far as future inclusions, it would be useful to display more threat intelligence, such as the actual area of the threat and the origin of the web crawling (Tor and Dark Web)."
"Certain features in Trellix Network Detection and Response, such as using AL-type commands, may initially pose a challenge for those unfamiliar with such commands. However, once users become accustomed to the system, it becomes easier to use."
"Cybersecurity posture has room for improvement."
"There is a lot of room for Improvement in the offering, from cost to functionality. It is pretty straightforward to implement which is an advantage. However, it falls short in pricing, detection capabilities, and, most importantly, reporting and policy management."
"It doesn't connect with the cloud, advanced machine learning is not there. A known threat can be coming into the network and we would want the cloud to look up the problem. I would also like to see them develop more file replication and machine learning."
"FireEye Network Security should have better integration with other vendors' firewalls or proxies, such as Palo Alto and Fortinet. Files that are being submitted should happen through the API or automatically."
More Trellix Network Detection and Response Pricing and Cost Advice →
Palo Alto Networks VM-Series is ranked 10th in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) with 53 reviews while Trellix Network Detection and Response is ranked 9th in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) with 37 reviews. Palo Alto Networks VM-Series is rated 8.6, while Trellix Network Detection and Response is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Palo Alto Networks VM-Series writes "Many features are optimized for troubleshooting real-time scenarios, saving a lot of time". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trellix Network Detection and Response writes "Offers in-depth investigation capabilities, integrates well and smoothly transitioned from a lower-capacity appliance to a higher one". Palo Alto Networks VM-Series is most compared with Azure Firewall, Fortinet FortiGate-VM, Fortinet FortiGate, Cisco Secure Firewall and Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls, whereas Trellix Network Detection and Response is most compared with Fortinet FortiSandbox, Palo Alto Networks WildFire, Zscaler Internet Access, Fortinet FortiGate and Vectra AI. See our Palo Alto Networks VM-Series vs. Trellix Network Detection and Response report.
See our list of best Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) vendors.
We monitor all Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
