We performed a comparison between Portnox CORE and Tenable Security Center based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, HPE Aruba Networking, Forescout and others in Network Access Control (NAC)."The technical support is top-notch."
"There is an add-on feature for application control to kill unwanted applications when launched on a user's device."
"I am impressed with the solution's voucher capability and authentication. The tool is integrated with Active Direct storage."
"For the information security team, the security level was improved because it helped to manage and prevent rogue devices from connecting to the corporate network. The reporting was granular, and reports we scheduled for delivery on Portnox were useful during investigations and audits, especially in cases where the IP address changed."
"The minute people have issues on their network, we can see what is happening right away."
"Technical support was very helpful when we needed them."
"It's so easy to set up, you don't need outside assistance."
"The Vidahost feature is currently in action, and it appears to be providing valuable data insights."
"The most valuable feature of the product is the Assurance Report Card, which gives us an overview of the security poster in just a simple glance."
"Has a great advanced scanning feature."
"Very customizable with a lot of templates."
"This solution has a much lower rate of false positives compared to competing products."
"Tenable.sc is user-friendly."
"We use Tenable to scan all of our environments and plugins for vulnerabilities. Tenable helps us discover network vulnerabilities to threats and piracy."
"Support is knowledgeable."
"The most valuable features of Tenable SC are scanning, reporting, dashboards, and automation."
"The licensing is based on a per-port price, even when you are not using all of the ports, and this is something that could be improved."
"One of the things for the on-premise is that sometimes you click on it and it takes a while for it to respond."
"Now, the way security is viewed, maybe including something like AI, to automate some of the things that are required to be done would be great."
"The product should consider more integration with vendors like Huawei. It should also improve visibility. The solution should offer a partner portal that can provide customers training on the in and out of the solution."
"The price could be better."
"The solution did have some stability issues, however, all I had to do was restart it."
"It would be good to integrate Portnox CORE with CLEAR."
"Portnox CORE can improve on support for unmanaged switches (or hubs) and other brands of network devices. These kinds of devices are still in use in organisations, especially SMEs who cannot afford to buy a managed switch."
"The product should provide risk-based vulnerability management."
"For downloading reports, we have to go to the scan and then we have to go to the reports and download the Excel or CSV or PDF. I think these menus and clicks can be minimized."
"Tenable SC could improve by making the creation of the initial reports easier that correspond to our network."
"The web application scanning area can be improved."
"Tenable SC can improve by adding more integrations with HCI-type tools and more accurate vulnerability detection."
"Though the solution's technical support is responsive, they do take a lot of time, making it one of the solution's shortcomings that needs improvement."
"The solution should provide better web application features and support."
"Current web page needs improvement, slows down processes."
Portnox CORE is ranked 11th in Network Access Control (NAC) with 14 reviews while Tenable Security Center is ranked 1st in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management with 48 reviews. Portnox CORE is rated 8.2, while Tenable Security Center is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Portnox CORE writes "Simple UI, easy deployment but slow authentication times for devices". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tenable Security Center writes "A security solution for vulnerability assessment with automated scans". Portnox CORE is most compared with Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), Aruba ClearPass, Fortinet FortiNAC, Forescout Platform and Portnox Clear, whereas Tenable Security Center is most compared with Tenable Vulnerability Management, Qualys VMDR, Tenable Nessus, Rapid7 InsightVM and Horizon3.ai.
We monitor all Network Access Control (NAC) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
