We performed a comparison between PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition and Qualys VMDR based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The product is easy to use."
"The product's initial setup phase was super easy."
"We are in the early stage of using the solution making it difficult to fully determine the best features. However, we have noticed the CMDB and device discovery features look valuable at this time."
"I like normal dynamic scanning, general web applications scanning, and vulnerability assessments."
"The most valuable features of PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition are the vast amount of options and ease of use. They frequently improve the solution every six months to a year. Additionally, if we want any more features we can upload a custom script to meet our needs."
"The initial setup is straightforward."
"The tool is loaded with many features that give us ROI."
"Parallel scans can be done with PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition."
"The Vulnerability Management and Patch Management features are the most valuable features of this solution."
"The initial setup is straightforward."
"Tech support is helpful."
"Qualys VM's best features are vulnerability management and customizable scoring."
"The reporting is fine."
"I like Qualys because it is a very complete product, more so than Tenable."
"This is one of the best products I have worked with so far. I like the power of Qualys, and it's a better solution because you can scan a compact file, a BIT file, or batch files. The product already knows what's happening inside, and you don't need to expand the package. Tenable will do the same thing, but you need to have a package issuance claim. With Qualys, we can immediately understand the file, even a compact file. If there's some kind of discovery or incident, you will know what happened in the environment."
"It is very easy to use and there are lots of options. We can usually easily go through it and all of the things we want to configure, and we can configure everything to our specifications very easily."
"The implementation of the solution is quite complicated and could be easier."
"The solution is a bit expensive."
"It would be better if the solution is cloud-based."
"The product needs to have the ability to evaluate more."
"There are features or functionality missing, but PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition does try to update frequently to alleviate the shortcomings."
"The stability of the scans could be improved."
"The cost per license per user could be cheaper, specifically for individual licensing."
"There's definitely room for improvement. There are lots of false positives. Once I do the manual assessment, it comes as a false positive. They need to improve the Enterprise Edition, especially the part that gives false positives."
"The reporting in this solution can be improved."
"The reporting and the GUI need improvements."
"They're still evolving their platform in terms of reporting capabilities."
"Qualys could improve the inbuilt dashboards."
"When tested on Zero day, there were errors."
"I would like to see this solution simplified to work more easily in a multi-cloud environment."
"The disadvantage of working with Qualys is that the graphical interface is quite outdated."
"We are moving away from Qualys to Defender ATP because I find that Defender ATP is much better at prioritizing the vulnerabilities that I should be looking at."
More PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition Pricing and Cost Advice →
PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition is ranked 4th in Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) with 8 reviews while Qualys VMDR is ranked 3rd in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management with 77 reviews. PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition is rated 8.0, while Qualys VMDR is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition writes " With a super easy initial setup phase, the tool also offers regular updates". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Qualys VMDR writes "Good visibility but expensive and needs better support". PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition is most compared with Acunetix, Tenable Nessus, Rapid7 Metasploit, Tenable Vulnerability Management and Rapid7 InsightVM, whereas Qualys VMDR is most compared with Tenable Nessus, Tenable Security Center, Rapid7 InsightVM, Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management and Tenable Vulnerability Management. See our PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition vs. Qualys VMDR report.
We monitor all Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
