We performed a comparison between Proofpoint Targeted Attack Protection and Trellix Collaboration Security based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Palo Alto Networks, Fortinet and others in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)."It has a dynamic runtime engine, which gives it an advantage over Prisma that has a static engine. In Prisma, we have to do additional malware analysis, which is not required in Proofpoint."
"FireEye Email Security is easy to use."
"The auto-remediation feature is valuable."
"We have had very good results from the use of FireEye Email Security. We are very comfortable with this technology, but I don't know if it's necessary to move into the cloud, we will check other technologies and study them. Additionally, the solution has good integration."
"We can control this solution from the cloud and are able to access it from wherever we are."
"The initial setup is simple."
"What I find most valuable with the solution is that it can integrate with cloud solutions, such as Google and Microsoft. Additionally, the solution is easy to use."
"FireEye Email Security helps us prevent spam and phishing emails and all other business-compromised email attacks."
"The solution's most valuable feature is its simplicity. It's very user-friendly."
"We are using the TRAP console that has a Linux-based UI, which is not user-friendly. The TAP console looks very advanced. Currently, we are maintaining three different consoles, and it is sometimes hard to switch between them or try to grab the data."
"Sometimes especially zero-day spam emails can be passed to the user's inbox."
"In general, our company should make the tool more robust to protect our systems."
"The solution needs better support."
"FireEye needs single sign-on. They say it's on their roadmap. They should also implement support for Microsoft Authenticator app for 2FA."
"I would like to see this solution become more flexible."
"The solution must provide features to scan QR codes for threats."
"The custom tailoring is limited."
"The solution is not easy to set up. However, we have employees that have the knowledge that can do the difficult implementation. It would be better if the process was easier."
More Trellix Collaboration Security Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Proofpoint Targeted Attack Protection is ranked 23rd in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) while Trellix Collaboration Security is ranked 17th in Email Security with 13 reviews. Proofpoint Targeted Attack Protection is rated 7.0, while Trellix Collaboration Security is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Proofpoint Targeted Attack Protection writes "Dynamic runtime engine and good protection, but needs better support and a single console". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trellix Collaboration Security writes "Has an easy implementation phase to deal with for users". Proofpoint Targeted Attack Protection is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Office 365, Avanan, IRONSCALES, Palo Alto Networks WildFire and Microsoft Defender for Identity, whereas Trellix Collaboration Security is most compared with Cisco Secure Email, Proofpoint Email Protection, Microsoft Defender for Office 365, Microsoft Exchange Online Protection (EOP) and Trend Micro Email Security.
We monitor all Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
