We performed a comparison between PRTG Network Monitor and Veeam ONE based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Zabbix, New Relic and others in Cloud Monitoring Software."It is pretty simple to use, which is always a good thing. It's been very reliable in updating us if any issues crop up."
"It helps the entire organization become digitally enabled."
"The initial setup is very simple."
"It is able to satisfy all our requirements in terms of email notifications and specific errors on the devices."
"PRTG Network Monitor's best features are its flexibility, ease of implementation, user-friendliness, and intuitive interfaces."
"There was only one feature I liked about PRTG Network Monitor a lot, and that was bandwidth monitoring, though, in the newer versions of the tool, that feature is now a bit lacking. Pricing for PRTG Network Monitor is also not as expensive. It's a good tool, even for beginners."
"The most valuable features of PRTG Network Monitor are the threshold notification when certain traffic increases and goes beyond the defined threshold. The up and down status email notifications and other notifications are useful. Additionally, it is user-friendly, and customizable, and there are many features available."
"Speed of deployment is one of the most valuable features."
"The feature that we have found most valuable is its traffic plan. The traffic plan is very good."
"I like the tool's backup."
"I like the backup and backup copy features."
"Veaam ONE is a very good product in virtualized environments."
"Setting up Veeam is easy, and it's portable, too."
"The solution is quite stable."
"The product is very straightforward and very easy to use from the client-side."
"The tool is a stable backup solution."
"Integration into service management ticketing systems could be better. They should simplify the integration into big service management platforms like ServiceNow, Remedy, and Cherwell. They're really into monitoring, but they don't do any self-resolution. It would be better if the company moved more into the AIOps space so that you could actually kick off some remedies. I know that you can execute some commands from the tool, but you need to develop those all yourself. It would be really handy if they had some auto-remedy scripts that they could develop on top."
"We run it in a cluster, so we have two that run together. The cluster behind it is sketchy at times."
"The inventory of the device should be improved."
"A room for improvement in PRTG Network Monitor is its sensors. Its application technology sensor, such as the IAS, .NET, etc., needs some improvement because it doesn't work as expected. For example, the IAS sensor doesn't give immediate information, and the information you get from it isn't of good value. The web GUI of PRTG Network Monitor also needs improvement because errors keep popping up if it's not been updated to the latest version. What I'd like to see in the next release of the tool is end-to-end topology mapping for the business model, and that should be required. There has to be a technical map. Technical mapping and topological creation are missing in PRTG Network Monitor, so I would like to see those in the future."
"Other monitoring tools that I have used are easier to use."
"The technical support could respond a little bit quicker."
"Users need to buy the more expensive licenses if they expect to be able to scale."
"PRTG Network Monitor should improve the NetFlow dashboard, there is no flexibility, and the NetFlow is not meeting the business needs. Additionally, they are missing part of the configuration management."
"Agent backups could be better. I have many problems with agent backups, particularly on Linux and MySQL databases. MySQL works well with Microsoft products but not with other products. The database backups are not working correctly, and we are losing business. I am not getting any support; administration is also a significant problem."
"The threshold could be easier to configure."
"The user experience can be better, as it is one of the areas with shortcomings in the product."
"If you don't have technical knowledge about these services, monitoring the virtual machines is hard."
"The appliance doesn't have a domain. If there was a competitor with a domain, I'd likely use them."
"Veeam ONE could be improved if it had a better data recovery feature."
"The solution is not very good at backing up the physical Linux systems."
"There is a bug that prevents enabling the restore button, which is hectic."
PRTG Network Monitor is ranked 7th in Cloud Monitoring Software with 96 reviews while Veeam ONE is ranked 18th in Cloud Monitoring Software with 57 reviews. PRTG Network Monitor is rated 8.2, while Veeam ONE is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of PRTG Network Monitor writes "It's an all-in-one solution, and net flow is included in the licensing ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Veeam ONE writes "A tool useful to monitor infrastructures and for backup purposes that needs to improve its deployment process". PRTG Network Monitor is most compared with Zabbix, Centreon, Nagios XI, SolarWinds NPM and ManageEngine OpManager, whereas Veeam ONE is most compared with Veeam Backup & Replication, VMware Aria Operations, VMware vSphere, SolarWinds Virtualization Manager and CloudPhysics.
See our list of best Cloud Monitoring Software vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
