We performed a comparison between QPR ProcessAnalyzer and SAP Signavio Process Intelligence based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Process Mining solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."I have found the most valuable features of QPR ProcessAnalyzer to be Process Discovery, KPIs, definition, and dashboarding. These are the main features we are working on."
"Discovery and root cause analysis"
"The backend is great."
"The product is relatively user friendly, it does what you need it to do."
"It's easy to set up."
"The most valuable feature is the integration model."
"Being able to deploy in shorter cuts."
"The initial setup was simple. One can know how exactly the process performs just by clicking a few buttons."
"The product helps us build solid business use cases."
"By clearly defining process owners, customers can not only better achieve their goals but are always accountable to partners and audits."
"Communication with clients could be improved."
"The user interface of QPR ProcessAnalyzer could improve, it is not very intuitive."
"There could be more standard interfaces for importing data from the various systems in the process landscape."
"The area that could be improved in SAP Signavio Process Intelligence is its Journey modeling feature."
"The challenge for a solution that utilizes modeling notations, is that the look and feel of the models (e.g. in BPMN) is pre-defined."
"When it comes to Signavio, as I've worked on Celonis, I've observed two things in Celonis and Signavio. In Celonis, using the process mining tool, we can implement automation skills. So we can take actions to improve the process as well. That is one thing."
"I would like to see a better version of the solution."
"SAP has to figure out a better way to price it. Their licensing structure isn't ideal as it's based on data; therefore, it's hard to estimate client costs."
"It should be able to convert business workflows into media documents quickly."
"Interface could be more user friendly."
More SAP Signavio Process Intelligence Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
QPR ProcessAnalyzer is ranked 15th in Process Mining while SAP Signavio Process Intelligence is ranked 6th in Process Mining with 13 reviews. QPR ProcessAnalyzer is rated 8.6, while SAP Signavio Process Intelligence is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of QPR ProcessAnalyzer writes "Useful dashboards, plenty of features, and initial setup simple". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP Signavio Process Intelligence writes "A scalable and stable tool that needs to provide its users with an exact focus on where process transformations can happen". QPR ProcessAnalyzer is most compared with Celonis, whereas SAP Signavio Process Intelligence is most compared with Celonis, UiPath Process Mining and Software AG ARIS Process Mining. See our QPR ProcessAnalyzer vs. SAP Signavio Process Intelligence report.
See our list of best Process Mining vendors.
We monitor all Process Mining reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
