We performed a comparison between QPR ProcessAnalyzer and UiPath Process Mining based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Celonis, UiPath, Automation Anywhere and others in Process Mining."Discovery and root cause analysis"
"I have found the most valuable features of QPR ProcessAnalyzer to be Process Discovery, KPIs, definition, and dashboarding. These are the main features we are working on."
"The most valuable features of UiPath Process Mining are the ease of use, it's provided us with good indicators of which processes can be automated. There are lots of non-value-add activities which are being done that have helped us identify. If we apply lead principles we are receiving a lot of benefits without automating. You are actually getting a lot of benefits even without automating."
"We find the solution to be really easy not just for development purposes, but also for its use and ability to be understood."
"I find the root cause analysis and the reference models to be valuable features of UiPath Process Mining."
"With UiPath in place, we are moving away from training people on the core applications, which are pretty complex. We've built a headless frontend, so it's really easy for anybody to join our company and be productive."
"UiPath Process Mining is definitely stable."
"Their support is really good, and it is a stable product."
"Simple solution that allows us to write code."
"We can connect Microsoft with the bot and share documents."
"The user interface of QPR ProcessAnalyzer could improve, it is not very intuitive."
"Communication with clients could be improved."
"We found that the flow chart is not very clear for some of the complex processes."
"The configurations on the ERP platforms could be improved."
"In terms of what can be improved, what I've seen so far in most of the implementations is that the client's expectations towards the RPA solution and their road map for the solution are different. The road map should be very clear in terms of what should be done and why it has to be done."
"I used to be a trainer and an instructional designer. I think the training has to be more specific — it's a little scattered."
"If UiPath can identify where it has gone wrong and try to identify the bottleneck value, which are more machine learning in AI, it would be great."
"It would be helpful to make the spy modules more accurate."
"We may need additional features for processing data."
"That depends whether I can get the input information to explain why the exceptions are happening. Is it because of different policies or incorrect procedure being applied? If that information would also being integrated as part of it, it would make my life easier."
Earn 20 points
QPR ProcessAnalyzer is ranked 15th in Process Mining while UiPath Process Mining is ranked 2nd in Process Mining with 74 reviews. QPR ProcessAnalyzer is rated 8.6, while UiPath Process Mining is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of QPR ProcessAnalyzer writes "Useful dashboards, plenty of features, and initial setup simple". On the other hand, the top reviewer of UiPath Process Mining writes "A stable solution with a comparison feature that helps people to understand and visualize the impact of a particular task". QPR ProcessAnalyzer is most compared with Celonis and SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, whereas UiPath Process Mining is most compared with Celonis, SAP Signavio Process Manager, FortressIQ, Minit and SAP Signavio Process Intelligence.
See our list of best Process Mining vendors.
We monitor all Process Mining reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.