We compared VMware Tanzu Mission Control and OpenShift Container Platform based on our user's reviews in several parameters.
VMware Tanzu Mission Control and OpenShift Container Platform both offer competitive pricing, efficient setup processes, and positive customer service experiences. VMware Tanzu Mission Control is praised for its management capabilities, multi-cloud deployment, and security measures, while OpenShift Container Platform is lauded for its system integration, resource management, and application scalability. Users suggest VMware Tanzu Mission Control could improve on user interface and performance, while OpenShift Container Platform could enhance UI, system performance, resource management, and language support.
Features: VMware Tanzu Mission Control offers comprehensive management capabilities, multi-cloud deployment, resource utilization, user-friendly interface, security measures, and automation. OpenShift Container Platform focuses on integration, resource management, security, customization, and scalability of applications.
Pricing and ROI: The setup cost for VMware Tanzu Mission Control is minimal and straightforward, with no additional complexities. The licensing process is hassle-free and transparent, allowing flexibility for various deployment scenarios. In comparison, the setup process for OpenShift Container Platform is also straightforward and efficient. The licensing model is commended for its flexibility in meeting the needs of different users., In terms of return on investment, VMware Tanzu Mission Control has proven to be valuable for managing and controlling VMware ecosystems. Users reported improved efficiency and resource allocation. On the other hand, OpenShift Container Platform offers significant improvements in resource utilization, scalability, efficiency, and cost savings. It has enabled increased productivity and revenue growth through optimized operations and streamlined workflows.
Room for Improvement: VMware Tanzu Mission Control has room for improvement in terms of user interface, performance, documentation, and customization options. OpenShift Container Platform, on the other hand, could benefit from enhancements in user interface, system performance, resource management, and support for different programming languages.
Deployment and customer support: In comparing the reviews, it can be concluded that the duration to establish a new tech solution with VMware Tanzu Mission Control typically takes one week for both deployment and setup phases, while with OpenShift Container Platform, it can range from one week for both phases to three months for deployment and an additional week for setup. The context in which these terms are used must be carefully evaluated., The customer service for VMware Tanzu Mission Control has been highly praised for being excellent, top-notch, and responsive. Users appreciate the promptness and efficiency of the support team. OpenShift Container Platform also receives positive feedback, with users valuing the promptness, responsiveness, and expertise of the support staff. Overall, users express satisfaction with the customer service experience provided by both platforms.
The summary above is based on 39 interviews we conducted recently with VMware Tanzu Mission Control and OpenShift Container Platform users. To access the review's full transcripts, download our report.
"The software is user-friendly and straightforward to use, which is favorable to a developer."
"Centralized control of container resources is most valuable."
"The initial setup process is easy."
"The operating system has a live update and is more secure than any other. It's made for Atomic OS, a lightweight OS new to the market. I also like the source-to-image capabilities. The customer can directly deploy their applications from the repository. It's a highly flexible and easy way to deploy into production."
"Openshift is a very developer-friendly product."
"I think it's a pretty scalable tool...The solution's technical support has been pretty good."
"It’s user-friendly."
"The most valuable are security features, particularly when operating in the cloud."
"It definitely gives the end customer a good overview and perspective of running applications in terms of overall workload footprint. TMC provides a very detailed description of your cloud-native application in the form of graphical visualization."
"I have multiple Kubernetes environments within my environment. TMC gives me a single pane view, which is good for managing everything."
"A feature we find valuable is that other products can also be integrated with Mission Control. This means that we can see the status of specific clusters, as well as view the monitoring application logs all from one point."
"The most valuable feature of VMware Tanzu Mission Control is the management functionality of the cluster life cycle. Additionally, the solution integrates well with other vendors, such as Velero for backups and Sonobuoy for compliance. Additionally, it works well in multi-cluster environments."
"The most popular feature of VMware Tanzu Mission Control is its graphical user interface for describing network policies on the Service Mesh, which is highly integrable with other tools commonly used in supply chains such as security."
"Tanzu Mission Control has quite a set of rich features when compared to OpenShift."
"The most important feature of Tanzu Mission Control is its integration with the other products, especially with ESX and vSAN. This is a strong part of Tanzu Mission Control. In other solutions, such as OpenShift or Kubernetes, you can find similar features, but they don't have similar integration. With Tanzu Mission Control, you get a total solution with only one provider. You have the integration with the infrastructure, virtualization of networking, and virtualization of storage. You have a natural integration, and you don't have the problem of integrating it with different products or providers. Sometimes, different companies have good integration, but it is not always guaranteed. For example, many years ago, Cisco and VMware were good partners in networking, but when VMware started to sell ESX, the relationship was broken. This is the problem that you can face when you are using solutions from two different companies."
"The most important thing about the solution is its flexibility."
"There is room for improvement with integration."
"The setup process is not great."
"Setting up OpenShift isn't easy. I rate it three out of ten for ease of setup. We're deploying it in three phases. They're in the second phase now. The total deployment time will be five months. We expect to complete the deployment this March. There are 13 people on three teams working on this deployment."
"OpenShift Container Platform is an expensive solution, and its pricing could be improved."
"Things are there and the documentation is there, however, there still needs to be quick guides available."
"The UI could be more user-friendly to drive tasks more effectively through the interface."
"Whenever we onboard or deploy services that talk to Oracle Database, they take a lot of time to become active and serve the incoming request, so it would be good to see some improvement here. This could be an OpenShift issue or an internal network problem within our organization."
"The stability needs improvement."
"The solution could improve by having better integration with other solutions such as HPE."
"LYNX is a managed cluster solution that takes care of specific details within a cluster, such as sequences or services. I haven't seen this feature in Tanzu Mission Control."
"Having a unified dashboard to manage all infrastructure, whether it involves additional IT infrastructure or modern apps, would be highly advantageous"
"The infrastructure is quite challenging."
"Cost is always a concern. Smaller companies might find the price a bigger issue."
"Tanzu provides better manageability as compared to OCP, but when it comes to tagging it with other products, it's a bit rigid. If I have to bring in any new product or something out of the box from a different vendor, working with Tanzu becomes a little difficult. For example, if I want to use the F5 services, I have to add one more layer of Avi, but I don't want to do that. If I have a list of the products that I want to use, such as for firewall services, with Tanzu, I will have to go through another layer, which creates complexity."
"The network control and security policies must be improved."
"We want to see a new feature that helps build more security architecture like Zero Trust Security or shifting left in Kubernetes."
More Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform Pricing and Cost Advice →
Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform is ranked 1st in Container Management with 37 reviews while VMware Tanzu Mission Control is ranked 3rd in Container Management with 12 reviews. Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform is rated 8.2, while VMware Tanzu Mission Control is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform writes "Provides automation that speeds up our process by 30% and helps us achieve zero downtime". On the other hand, the top reviewer of VMware Tanzu Mission Control writes "Gives a single pane to manage multiple Kubernetes environments and has competitive pricing". Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform is most compared with Amazon EKS, Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE, Amazon Elastic Container Service, Rancher Labs and Kubernetes, whereas VMware Tanzu Mission Control is most compared with Rancher Labs, Kubernetes, Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE, Amazon EKS and Docker. See our Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform vs. VMware Tanzu Mission Control report.
See our list of best Container Management vendors.
We monitor all Container Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.