We performed a comparison between Riversand MDMCenter and SAP Master Data Governance based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Master Data Management (MDM) Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It's a stable solution. I have no complaints."
"Has a good user interface and the ability to update large sets of products quickly."
"I like their matching feature, and the survivorship rules are very strong. I also like their out-of-box reports, data quality dashboards, and more. Those are also very handy and helpful. Internally, I like the kind of configurations that we can create, validations, and enhancements. Those configurations are pretty straightforward and useful. It's a user-friendly tool that is very cool."
"SAP Master Data Governance is a customizable solution and is flexible."
"The solution is great at standardizing all of our records."
"It is a stable solution...The initial setup of SAP Master Data Governance is very easy."
"Some of the features that I have found to be beneficial are the search and uploads functions."
"The data capturing and data governance features are valuable."
"The product is easy to use and is beneficial from a data governance perspective."
"We've found the solution to be quite flexible."
"The ability to identify and manage duplicate data is valuable. The solution automatically checks for duplication possibilities based on criteria like name matching."
"The solution does not have a good match and search capability."
"Integration could be better. Riversand is majorly focusing on only the MDM hub part. They don't have their own integration platform. We have to rely on a third-party integration partner. They say this is the format, and it's the client's responsibility to bring the data into their required format. They have to have an integration partner and develop their integration capabilities. It's not so flexible to read any data format or system, for example, SAP. They don't have a connector."
"The ability to create bespoke workflows could be improved."
"They should improve the solution's performance as sometimes the process consumes much time."
"It could be more user-friendly."
"The profiling feature, especially for materials, needs improvement. We faced challenges maintaining specific details for a single material from multiple vendors."
"Lacks some features that are available in other solutions."
"The platform's pricing needs improvement."
"The implementation could be easier."
"Overall, they just a little bit more flexibility in terms of assigning roles or adding new roles. We have a longer approval process, so we need to break it down into more roles than what is typically available and we need to hard-code it."
"The multidomain MDM feature is based on EIP systems, which may not be a good model for all master data."
Riversand MDMCenter is ranked 7th in Master Data Management (MDM) Software with 3 reviews while SAP Master Data Governance is ranked 1st in Master Data Management (MDM) Software with 22 reviews. Riversand MDMCenter is rated 8.4, while SAP Master Data Governance is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Riversand MDMCenter writes "Updates large sets of products quickly; provides good off-the-shelf functionality". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP Master Data Governance writes "Provides efficient technical support services, but it could be more affordable ". Riversand MDMCenter is most compared with Stibo STEP MDM and Informatica MDM, whereas SAP Master Data Governance is most compared with Informatica MDM, TIBCO EBX, Microsoft MDS, Reltio Cloud and Enterworks Enable. See our Riversand MDMCenter vs. SAP Master Data Governance report.
See our list of best Master Data Management (MDM) Software vendors.
We monitor all Master Data Management (MDM) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
