We performed a comparison between SAP Process Orchestration and SAS Access based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business-to-Business Middleware solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution is stable."
"The solution's technical support is good."
"I rate the product's setup phase a nine on a scale of one to ten, where one is difficult and ten is easy since it is a very easy process."
"The initial setup was straightforward."
"The most valuable feature is the seamless integration with backend systems."
"The product has good technical support but you usually will not need it because it is quite stable."
"It provides essential features such as continuous monitoring of all interfaces are crucial for our needs."
"The most valuable features of SAP Process Orchestration are its system monitoring and alerts."
"The most valuable feature is you have native access to the external databases."
"The most valuable part of SAS/ACCESS is what it is made for: connecting to remote systems that are not part of your physical SAS environment."
"The most valuable aspect of the solution is the ease of access to the data in those databases."
"The monitoring governance offered by SAP is too technical and needs to be geared more toward business users."
"The product roadmap suggests it will approach the end of support in several years, and a lot of innovations are now implemented by SAP not in SAP PO, but in SAP Integration Suite, hence, the platform is stable, but doesn't receive a lot of new features in recent updates."
"The responsiveness of technical support needs to be improved."
"It requires some maintenance."
"The solution needs to move to the cloud."
"This is an on-premise platform and one area they can improve on is having the ability to work with SaaS solutions."
"In terms of technical support, it would be helpful if they handled the tickets a bit faster when queries are sent to them."
"It is scalable, but there can be performance issues with high data volume or traffic, especially during month ends."
"The solution can provide access to the newer databases that come out sooner."
"The pricing model needs to be reconsidered and adjusted."
"I can't really recall any missing feature or general improvement that is needed. We don't really add too many new kinds of databases and therefore our needs are already met."
SAP Process Orchestration is ranked 1st in Business-to-Business Middleware with 28 reviews while SAS Access is ranked 42nd in Data Integration with 3 reviews. SAP Process Orchestration is rated 8.2, while SAS Access is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of SAP Process Orchestration writes "A tool that can be useful for small integrations and large integrations". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAS Access writes "The solution is stable, scalable, and flexible". SAP Process Orchestration is most compared with Mule Anypoint Platform, SAP Data Services, IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services, webMethods Integration Server and IBM B2B Integrator, whereas SAS Access is most compared with Delphix and Toad Data Point. See our SAP Process Orchestration vs. SAS Access report.
We monitor all Business-to-Business Middleware reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
