We performed a comparison between Selenium HQ and Visual Studio Test Professional based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Functional Testing Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution is very easy to implement."
"Some of the most valuable features of this solution are open-source, they have good support, good community support, and it supports multiple languages whether you use C-Sharp or not. These are some of the most important benefits."
"The stability of the solution has been good, it is reliable we have not had any bugs."
"Our platform runs into several thousand screens and a few thousand test cases, something which would typically take months to test manually. As of today, the entire process takes a little over two days to run."
"Selenium web driver - Java."
"It is more stable in comparison to other solutions because they have quite some experience in the market."
"It is compatible with and supports multiple languages, such as Java and Python. It is open source, and it is widely used."
"Since Selenium HQ has multiple plug-ins, we can use it with multiple tools and multiple languages."
"The tool is flexible and easy to manage. We use it since it is scalable and easy to use. It integrates with solutions."
"The most valuable features of Visual Studio Test Professional are the IntelliSense and the ease of adding the NuGet packages."
"Visual Studio Test Professional is a very scalable solution."
"Visual Studio Test Professional is a scalable solution."
"Customization is the most powerful feature of this product."
"Visual Studio is the easiest to use."
"The solution is very useful for compiling existing projects and developing new projects."
"The documentation is easy, and it helps us solve our problems."
"I have found that at times the tool does not catch the class features of website content correctly. The product's AWS configuration is also hard."
"It takes such a long time to use this solution that it may be worth looking into other free solutions such as TestProject or Katalon Studio, or paid solutions to replace it."
"Selenium HQ can improve the authorization login using OTP, it is not able to be done in this solution."
"Could have additional readability and abstraction."
"Sometimes we face challenges with Selenium HQ. There are third party tools that we use, for example for reading the images, that are not easy to plug in. The third party add-ons are difficult to get good configuration and do not have good support. I would like to see better integration with other products."
"It would be awesome if there was a standalone implementation of Selenium for non-developer users."
"The solution does not offer up enough information in regards to personality testing."
"Selenium has room for improvement as it does not support the tests and result-sharing in anything but a manual way."
"The documentation is limited."
"In Visual Studio we still don't have anything which can pinpoint memory leaks on a certain code line."
"The price could be improved."
"The solution's documentation could be improved because it keeps disappearing from the solution."
"The vendor must release a lightweight version of the solution."
"The server that we use is very slow so that is concerning for us."
"Enhancing the support for web application testing and load performance would be an improvement."
"The solution's deployment is not very easy and should be made easier."
More Visual Studio Test Professional Pricing and Cost Advice →
Selenium HQ is ranked 5th in Functional Testing Tools with 102 reviews while Visual Studio Test Professional is ranked 7th in Functional Testing Tools with 46 reviews. Selenium HQ is rated 8.0, while Visual Studio Test Professional is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Selenium HQ writes "Continuously being developed and large community makes it easy to find solutions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Visual Studio Test Professional writes "Customization is a key feature as is the ability to integrate with third-party services ". Selenium HQ is most compared with Eggplant Test, Tricentis Tosca, Worksoft Certify, Telerik Test Studio and OpenText Silk Test, whereas Visual Studio Test Professional is most compared with TFS, Apache JMeter, Tricentis NeoLoad, SmartBear TestComplete and TestRail. See our Selenium HQ vs. Visual Studio Test Professional report.
See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
