We performed a comparison between SentinelOne Singularity Identity and Tenable Vulnerability Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Vulnerability Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Having high visibility into all of our network concerns and a customizable UI are the most valuable features."
"The protection provided by SentinelOne Singularity Identity is the most valuable feature."
"I like the detection and protection features. We don't need to do anything, and it will alert us when the mitigation is not successful. We only need to target those endpoints. Otherwise, we don't have to do anything about that."
"The XDR capabilities are very good."
"They have different levels of support. We have the highest level where they are constantly checking all the endpoints. If at any certain point, they identify that a computer has been triggered by a virus, a link, or something else, they would automatically tell us that within 15 seconds. If they notice something, they automatically send us an email saying that they noticed something in the computer, and they are going to block it."
"SentinelOne Singularity Identity is very lightweight as an agent or software."
"The threat detection capability is the most valuable feature."
"The most valuable feature of SentinelOne Singularity Identity is its ability to detect based on behavior rather than just static signatures."
"The solution can integrate with third parties and meets standard compliance."
"The price of Tenable.io Vulnerability Management is reasonable as it is ten times cheaper than other options."
"One of the most valuable features of Tenable.io Vulnerability Management is its exportability, which allows us to conduct risk assessments efficiently."
"The initial setup is mostly straightforward."
"Tenable.io Vulnerability Management is an easy-to-use product. I"
"The initial setup is not complex."
"The solution creates vulnerability tickets within the VM profile but should also include them under the Remediation tab so the fixes can be viewed in the ticketing queue."
"The solution's most valuable feature is providing a single pane of visibility on all the infrastructure and its status."
"The solution's query resolution time could be reduced further, and a faster resolution could be provided."
"A lot of those features came from an acquisition of a different company."
"Our engineers are dealing with issues to add exclusions to the antivirus for custom applications."
"Sometimes I get kicked out of the console. I don't know why."
"SentinelOne Singularity Identity could be more user-friendly."
"The resolution turnaround from SentinelOne Singularity Identity's support should be improved."
"The policies could be more precise, and Singularity should use more templates like alternative solutions have. Endpoint management is poor. We cannot manage individual endpoints and must rely on policies, exclusions, or block lists to apply settings to a group instead of the individual agent. If I have to make settings for one computer, I need to create a group, apply the configuration, and move the agent there. It's challenging to manage endpoints that way."
"The primary reason for this discontent is that we frequently encounter performance issues with our servers."
"The reporting was never great in Tenable Vulnerability Management, so, in my company, we imported all the data into Ivanti RiskSense to start using it for reporting."
"The UI has room for improvement."
"The price could be lower."
"The tool's reports are bad. They're not very customizable or flexible. During audits, we often have to exclude things that aren't relevant to our organization, but we can't do that easily with the reports. They come in HTML or PDF format, and we can't compare current results with previous ones in Excel because we never receive reports in Excel."
"The one drawback that we have found is the reports."
"The stability has room for improvement."
"The initial setup is complex and has room for improvement."
"The product could be easier to set up on the cloud."
More SentinelOne Singularity Identity Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Tenable Vulnerability Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
SentinelOne Singularity Identity is ranked 9th in Vulnerability Management with 14 reviews while Tenable Vulnerability Management is ranked 2nd in Vulnerability Management with 38 reviews. SentinelOne Singularity Identity is rated 8.6, while Tenable Vulnerability Management is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of SentinelOne Singularity Identity writes "It offers deep and continuous visibility into our attack surface". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tenable Vulnerability Management writes "Discovers vulnerabilities and integrates well with other solutions". SentinelOne Singularity Identity is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Identity, Qualys VMDR, SailPoint IdentityIQ, Microsoft Defender for Office 365 and XM Cyber, whereas Tenable Vulnerability Management is most compared with Tenable Security Center, Tenable Nessus, Qualys VMDR, Amazon Inspector and Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management. See our SentinelOne Singularity Identity vs. Tenable Vulnerability Management report.
See our list of best Vulnerability Management vendors.
We monitor all Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
