We performed a comparison between SentinelOne Vigilance and Sophos MDR based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Managed Detection and Response (MDR) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature is reviewing tickets and the notes added by technicians."
"The customization has been the most valuable aspect and was really the reason we ended up selecting Binary Defense. They worked with us to provide exactly the level of support, features, response, and collaboration we needed."
"With Binary Defense, we don't just get an alert, but also a detailed rundown of why they're alerting us on it. They tell us what was executed, or the username, script, or IP. That way, we're not wasting time investigating."
"Among the valuable features are the agent, continuous reporting, and dashboard. It has all the features we need and we haven't had to customize it, other than turning on certain features that we wanted."
"Binary Defense's most valuable feature is the 24/7 monitoring and threat hunting. Their team checks the latest breaches and how they're done."
"Binary Defense has a human service department that provides live monitoring for our systems."
"The best part about Binary Defense MDR is that it runs on everything, and they keep an eye on things 24/7."
"The most valuable features are the SIEM and the ticketing function; the latter is very smooth and easy to read and understand. We don't have any issues looking at the ticketing information when we're trying to identify what's going on."
"Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten...Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"The most valuable feature is that it works and isn't compromised. Other solutions I have used have all been compromised and SentinelOne is the only one that hasn't been compromised as far as I understand."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is its performance, which is very important for us in our company."
"SentinelOne Vigilance has very good detection."
"The most valuable feature is protection against ransomware and malware."
"The endpoint security software is great."
"The solution is very easy to use."
"I would rate SentinelOne's customer service and support a five out of five."
"The product’s most valuable feature is ease of use."
"The most valuable aspect of this solution is the ability to interact with the firewall and workstations seamlessly to shut down the threats. Additionally, you are able to control the workstations remotely."
"The product as a whole is truly outstanding and it excels in detecting and responding to various types of cyberattacks."
"There are lots of benefits because it includes real-time network threat detection (RNT), IP spoofing prevention, and a 24/7 support system. There is also protection against ransomware attacks."
"The user doesn't need a technician; it offers 24/7 support to identify and manage your infrastructure and take complete care of any technological incidents."
"The product’s most valuable features are integration and endpoint protection."
"The product gives us good visibility into what is happening inside the company."
"It is a scalable solution."
"We should be able to isolate devices faster. They should shorten the time between clicking on a device to contain it and carrying out the action. That would be a welcome improvement."
"It's hard to think of anything that they need to improve on, but just to point out something, I would like to see them provide advanced XDR."
"It's sometimes difficult to know when to engage Binary Defense or TrustedSec, their sister company. TrustedSec is more focused on offensive security, as opposed to the defensive security that the MDR solution provides. It would be awesome if there were a better bridge between that relationship for when we need to get more proactive services or when we need to do a penetration test."
"I would like to see more frequent check-ins with our security status."
"I would like to get more reports from Binary Defense about what they're blocking."
"We found a couple of bugs in the user interface."
"The current reporting system could benefit from improvement."
"The most significant area for improvement is in support for non-English speakers; we're a global organization, so many of our users are not English speakers, which can make interacting with them a challenge. There's no Chinese language support, so we must rely on what we can do with the internet. We don't expect Binary Defense to build a language staff, but details can get lost in translation when we assume the whole world speaks English."
"It is not easy to remove the customer without the dashboard."
"The process to replicate exclusions is not user-friendly."
"When upgrades are required on the server, you need to almost remove SentinelOne Vigilance completely off the system. We put SentinelOne Vigilance on silence for the monitor mode, but we were having trouble upgrading the server. I had to remove SentinelOne Vigilance completely from the server, but that meant that all the previous logs of attacks I wanted to look at on the server were gone. This is one thing they need to improve, they need better compatibility with the Microsoft Windows service. I should not have to remove the agent completely to upgrade the service."
"There's no problem with how this product works, but the toughest challenge that customers find is with its deployment and tuning. Getting it tuned properly takes some time. You can deploy it with just about anything, but it's always a challenge."
"SentinelOne Vigilance could improve if it provided us with more control over the dashboard."
"SentinelOne Vigilance doesn't have a direct connection with MSPs."
"The only thing I'm not sure about is I haven't deployed it on any mobile devices."
"The solution's memory forensics capabilities and hard disk capacities are quite basic."
"Its technical support could be better."
"Threat intelligence is an area for improvement for MDR."
"Sophos MDR lacks integration with MDM solutions."
"Sophos MDR’s pricing is the biggest factor that needs improvement per customers and technical professionals."
"The reports should be more comprehensive and easier to organize."
"It could be more secure."
"Endpoint protection is very slow."
"They should improve XDR and threat protection capabilities for zero-day attacks."
SentinelOne Vigilance is ranked 4th in Managed Detection and Response (MDR) with 18 reviews while Sophos MDR is ranked 5th in Managed Detection and Response (MDR) with 20 reviews. SentinelOne Vigilance is rated 8.4, while Sophos MDR is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of SentinelOne Vigilance writes "Very easy to use with multiple options for licensing and scaling". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Sophos MDR writes "Proactive protection, scalability, and cloud-based efficiency". SentinelOne Vigilance is most compared with Huntress, Blackpoint Cyber MDR, CrowdStrike Falcon Complete, Secureworks Taegis ManagedXDR and Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response, whereas Sophos MDR is most compared with CrowdStrike Falcon Complete, Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response, Trend Micro Managed XDR, Bitdefender MDR and Microsoft Defender Experts for Hunting. See our SentinelOne Vigilance vs. Sophos MDR report.
See our list of best Managed Detection and Response (MDR) vendors.
We monitor all Managed Detection and Response (MDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
