We performed a comparison between Sophos Cyberoam UTM and Stormshield Network Security based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Unified Threat Management (UTM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution's web filtering is an important feature for us in our company."
"The most valuable feature of Sophos Cyberoam UTM is the SD-WAN gateway."
"Web and content filtering are valuable in preventing people from abusing the network and pushing up the bandwidth price."
"Content filtering, as this enables me to control that which employees can view at different time quotas."
"The interface is user-friendly."
"The product is worth the investment."
"The performance has been good overall."
"Web Filtering and Application Filtering saves a lot of my bandwidth and improves the user's productivity."
"This solution is quick and easy to configure."
"A very robust product."
"Easily manageable in a variety of environments."
"It's an easy, straightforward management platform to use."
"The solution has improved my organization because I can see what traffic is happening and I can use it to block and prevent attacks."
"Ease of use is the best feature of the product."
"Our organization's main concern is stability, and this is a stable solution."
"I can see what traffic is going on. I can easily block any programs from attacks."
"Sophos VPN connectivity could be improved, as it can be lengthy, and users take longer to connect"
"The price is obviously a more sensitive area to focus on."
"The following could be improved: Web Filtering using wildcards; clarity regarding the firewall rules; granular reporting features."
"There are some issues with logs and report limitations."
"Hence, it needs to be easier to configure rules using the solution."
"While the security features are excellent, they could be improved."
"Sophos Cyberoam UTM has room for improvement in specific rules-based objects and redesign. The solution also needs to improve in adding rules and policies, including renewing and finding policies."
"The documentation is not straightforward."
"With Stormshield, there are difficulties joining things, and it can be complex depending on the architecture."
"The SD card could be more secure."
"This solution has a big problem with web filtering and it needs to be improved."
"Not all the fields are activated yet and we were informed that it will take at least one month."
"A more user-friendly interface would be helpful."
"The biggest issue was their support department was not able to help us, then everything stops. This is a no-go area for me."
"It could be better if it were more user-friendly. It's too complicated for us to use it. The price could be better as well."
"The product must improve its pricing."
Sophos Cyberoam UTM is ranked 7th in Unified Threat Management (UTM) with 81 reviews while Stormshield Network Security is ranked 9th in Unified Threat Management (UTM) with 16 reviews. Sophos Cyberoam UTM is rated 8.0, while Stormshield Network Security is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Sophos Cyberoam UTM writes "Stable and has a straightforward setup; reporting is fast and easy". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Stormshield Network Security writes "Handles monitoring, collection, analysis, and reporting of data in our HQ and branches". Sophos Cyberoam UTM is most compared with Fortinet FortiGate, Cisco Secure Firewall, Netgate pfSense, Juniper SRX Series Firewall and Sophos UTM, whereas Stormshield Network Security is most compared with Fortinet FortiGate, Netgate pfSense, OPNsense, Sophos XG and Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls. See our Sophos Cyberoam UTM vs. Stormshield Network Security report.
See our list of best Unified Threat Management (UTM) vendors.
We monitor all Unified Threat Management (UTM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
