We performed a comparison between SSIS and webMethods.io Integration based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Cloud Data Integration solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The performance is better than doing it in some alternative ways. We don't have to worry about so much manual work."
"The most valuable features of SSIS are that it works with the query language and it can import data from different sources."
"It has good data integration and good processes."
"We like that this solution includes a developer edition, free of charge, to allow for training."
"The technical support is very good."
"The most valuable features for our company are the flexibility and the quick turn around time in producing simple ETL solutions."
"SSIS provides you with lookup and transformation functions, and you have the flexibility to write your own custom code."
"The most important features are it works well and provides self-service BI."
"Our use case is for integration factory for SAP. It is mostly for SAP integration."
"The solution is scalable."
"It's easy to construct new interfaces like apps and client portals."
"There's hardware, software and application integration, providing hosting flexibility."
"The connectivity that the tool provides, along with the functionalities needed for our company's business, are some of the beneficial aspects of the product."
"I like the tool's scalability."
"Oracle's self-service capabilities, of which we make extensive use, is the most valuable feature."
"The solution could improve by having quicker release updates."
"Improving the login procedure would make our reporting easier on monitoring our ETL processes."
"You have to write push down join & lookup SQL to the database yourself via stored procedures or use of the SQL Task to get very high performance. That said, this is a common complaint for nearly all ETL tools on the market and those that offer an alternative such as Informatica offer them at a very expensive add-on price."
"There is connectivity with other databases, however, this is the most significant issue that has to be addressed."
"Tuning using this solution requires extensive expertise to improve performance."
"We In upgrading SSIS, we encountered challenges fixing SQL Server and performance issues, including problems during a failover in our data warehouse."
"The high prices attached to the product can be an area of concern where improvements are required."
"The performance of SSIS could improve when comparing it to Oracle Database."
"It is difficult to maintain."
"The solution's release management feature could be better."
"The product's stability is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"I am not satisfied with the solution because it takes too much effort to migrate and add new information. The migration could be easier."
"webMethods.io Integration's installation is complex. It should also improve integration and connectors."
"The products, at the moment, are new and there should perhaps be support for the older version of the protocols."
"Rules engine processes and BPM processes should be improved."
SSIS is ranked 2nd in Data Integration with 69 reviews while webMethods.io Integration is ranked 22nd in Cloud Data Integration with 7 reviews. SSIS is rated 7.6, while webMethods.io Integration is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of SSIS writes "Maintaining the solution and contacting its support team is easy". On the other hand, the top reviewer of webMethods.io Integration writes "Though the tool provides great connectivity functionality, it needs to be made more stable". SSIS is most compared with Informatica PowerCenter, Talend Open Studio, IBM InfoSphere DataStage, Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) and AWS Glue, whereas webMethods.io Integration is most compared with webMethods Integration Server, SAP Cloud Platform, Apigee and Microsoft Azure API Management. See our SSIS vs. webMethods.io Integration report.
See our list of best Cloud Data Integration vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.