We performed a comparison between Telerik Test Studio and Visual Studio Test Professional based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Functional Testing Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Has a very smooth process for launching and closing the application after execution."
"The performance and load testing are very good."
"Before using Telerik Test Studio, I was a manual tester, so it was my first automation tool, yet I felt very comfortable using it. I've used the record and play feature, and Telerik Test Studio was easy to use. The tool was easy to understand, even for a first-time user like me."
"The most valuable aspects of the solution are the font, size, and interface."
"The way it identifies elements is good."
"The stability has always been very good."
"Visual Studio is highly powerful. It's probably the best software development tool on the market."
"Visual Studio Test Professional's most valuable feature is the rich IDE for doing code and test development."
"Performance-wise, it is a great tool."
"It is very easy to use. You can handle a lot of things together at once in one package, which is a good point for us."
"The most valuable features of the solution are its ease of use and availability."
"The ability to quickly make your own components has been valuable."
"The most valuable feature has been to store all our packages in one place including SSIS packages, SQL tables, TFS and SSR."
"I observed that the Excel and Word validation was quite challenging, which is an area for improvement in the tool. I also experienced minor difficulties with Telerik Test Studio, particularly in fetching elements in some scenarios when using C# for coding."
"It can be improved by including a feature that allows multiple file types to be selected simultaneously."
"The charts need to be more detailed and customizable."
"There are some compatibility issues with the load standpoint test."
"Its UI is not very user-friendly and could be improved. For new users, it isn't easy."
"One of the problems with this solution is you need to be highly technically skilled to operate it, it is not for everyone."
"Sometimes, the product is too complex to use."
"The solution should be cheaper."
"Visual Studio Test Professional needs to improve its stability."
"Visual Studio Test Professional should include more automation."
"Visual Studio Test Professional could improve by having better integration with external databases."
"The product must provide more integration."
"It is hard to learn, and you need to invest time to understand it."
More Visual Studio Test Professional Pricing and Cost Advice →
Telerik Test Studio is ranked 18th in Functional Testing Tools with 5 reviews while Visual Studio Test Professional is ranked 7th in Functional Testing Tools with 46 reviews. Telerik Test Studio is rated 8.0, while Visual Studio Test Professional is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Telerik Test Studio writes "Very good performance and load testing capabilities". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Visual Studio Test Professional writes "Customization is a key feature as is the ability to integrate with third-party services ". Telerik Test Studio is most compared with Selenium HQ, Ranorex Studio, SmartBear TestComplete, Katalon Studio and Apache JMeter, whereas Visual Studio Test Professional is most compared with TFS, Apache JMeter, Tricentis NeoLoad, SmartBear TestComplete and OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise. See our Telerik Test Studio vs. Visual Studio Test Professional report.
See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
