We performed a comparison between Visual Studio Test Professional and Zeenyx AscentialTest based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools."The user interface is very friendly."
"The most valuable feature is the in-built support for C# and .NET projects."
"Code testing is the most valuable feature of this solution for developing software."
"Visual Studio is the easiest to use."
"The whole suite is made for .NET development."
"The most valuable features of Visual Studio Test Professional are the IntelliSense and the ease of adding the NuGet packages."
"I was satisfied with the support given by customer service."
"We are satisfied with technical support. Communicating with them is very simple. We also have a lot of online resources to check and to study and to train our team with. The documentation is very clear and readily available."
"If you use the PowerBuilder application, do choose AscentialTest without thinking twice."
"It’s been really easy to automate the same application TestComplete struggled with. I have been able to automate two of our key applications in just a few months. I haven’t even taken their training."
"The most valuable feature of AscentialTest for us is that it fully supports PowerBuilder."
"AscentialTest's object recognition in snapshots is a robust feature that goes beyond standard elements, even accurately identifying objects within Datawindows."
"The server that we use is very slow so that is concerning for us."
"Its UI could be better."
"It is hard to learn, and you need to invest time to understand it."
"The price is reasonable, but it's not the best."
"It needs more integration with other tools for monitoring. Microsoft also needs to make it more modern to make it work with microservices and the cloud. It is a bit outdated currently."
"The product must provide more integration."
"The data flow can be improved."
"I would like to see more integration in the solution."
"Classes are not as object-oriented as I would like, but I am a programmer and not QA so I expect a lot."
"The only thing I can't wait for is for Zeenyx to add automating Mobile apps."
"I would like to see an improvement in the User Interface."
"Streamlining the retrieval of results from individual test set runs would be beneficial."
More Visual Studio Test Professional Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Visual Studio Test Professional is ranked 7th in Functional Testing Tools with 46 reviews while Zeenyx AscentialTest is ranked 19th in Functional Testing Tools with 13 reviews. Visual Studio Test Professional is rated 8.6, while Zeenyx AscentialTest is rated 9.4. The top reviewer of Visual Studio Test Professional writes "Customization is a key feature as is the ability to integrate with third-party services ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Zeenyx AscentialTest writes "Robust automation with reusable steps and seamless integration". Visual Studio Test Professional is most compared with TFS, Apache JMeter, Tricentis NeoLoad, SmartBear TestComplete and TestRail, whereas Zeenyx AscentialTest is most compared with Tricentis Tosca and SmartBear TestComplete.
See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors and best Test Management Tools vendors.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
