We performed a comparison between Ab Initio Co>Operating System and AutoSys Workload Automation based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Workload Automation solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Co>Operating System's most valuable feature is its ability to process bulk data effectively."
"Ab Initio reaches the highest performance and is very flexible in processing huge amounts of data."
"The web UI is beneficial and the granular security policies allow us to cover all of our audit requirements."
"It scales very well. We can add jobs and remove jobs. We do not have problems maintaining the product across multiple environments and multiple servers."
"It works constantly and is pretty seamless. You do not have to open up many support tickets."
"It is a fairly stable solution."
"The aggregator reporting utility which tells us our throughput in lag and latency."
"CA Workload Automation AutoSys Edition is one of the most powerful schedulers that you have on the open systems, or going between Window servers; to be able to schedule and take advantage of the different powers that the automation has with it."
"I find that it provides better agility in regards to job execution features."
"The actual scheduling of our jobs has helped us tremendously. Before it was all done manually, and we've totally automated the whole functionality, so there's no longer a case where somebody didn't run something."
"An awesome improvement would be big data solutions, for example, implementing some kind of business intelligence or neural networks for artificial intelligence."
"Co>Operating System would be improved with more integrations for less well-known technologies."
"CA installation processes are never anything but complex."
"The reporting system, currently, could be better."
"They could do better supporting it. They have too many of the same type of products, so sometimes it doesn't get as much attention as it should."
"The lack of documentation, that is an issue. When we do need to bring it down for maintenance, it is always a scary moment for us because we have never had it crash."
"Performance improvements in the UI would be appreciated."
"Needs better documentation with fully explained examples for some of the job types."
"Some of the reports are either a bit hard to understand or don’t give you what you might expect to see."
"More benefits with the agent upgrades, and that's about it. Other than that we have no complaints with it. It's been awesome."
More Ab Initio Co>Operating System Pricing and Cost Advice →
Ab Initio Co>Operating System is ranked 22nd in Workload Automation with 2 reviews while AutoSys Workload Automation is ranked 6th in Workload Automation with 79 reviews. Ab Initio Co>Operating System is rated 9.6, while AutoSys Workload Automation is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Ab Initio Co>Operating System writes "Excellent bulk data processing for large enterprises". On the other hand, the top reviewer of AutoSys Workload Automation writes "Helps us manage complex workloads, reduce our workload failure rates, and save us time". Ab Initio Co>Operating System is most compared with SSIS, Collibra Catalog, AWS Glue, Azure Data Factory and MuleSoft Composer, whereas AutoSys Workload Automation is most compared with Control-M, IBM Workload Automation, Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, Automic Workload Automation and Stonebranch. See our Ab Initio Co>Operating System vs. AutoSys Workload Automation report.
See our list of best Workload Automation vendors.
We monitor all Workload Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.