We performed a comparison between GuardDuty and Trend Micro Cloud One based on our users’ reviews in five categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Features: AWS GuardDuty is highly regarded for its extensive monitoring capabilities, threat detection, and ability to analyze various log sources. Trend Micro Cloud One is highly praised for its vulnerability scanning and ability to provide visibility into critical events. Users have suggested that AWS GuardDuty could improve by adding a mobile version and more dashboard analytics. Reviewers feel that Trend Micro Cloud One should enhance automation, simplify deployment, and offer more competitive pricing.
Service and Support: AWS GuardDuty customers are satisfied with the swift and helpful support they've received from the Amazon team. Cloud One users commended Trend Micro's support team for their extensive knowledge and expertise.
Ease of Deployment: AWS GuardDuty users described the initial as simple and quick. Some Trend Micro Cloud One users said the setup was easy, but others noted that it may pose a challenge for less experienced users.
Pricing: AWS GuardDuty offers a pay-go license, with different pricing tiers based on usage levels. There are no extra costs apart from the standard licensing. Reviewers say Trend Micro Cloud One isn't expensive per se, but the license could be more competitive. Trend Micro offers monthly, quarterly, or annual payment options. Additional services can be purchased at an added cost.
ROI: AWS GuardDuty improves security and builds customer confidence, helping businesses expand. Trend Micro Cloud One provides a versatile return on investment by offering effortless integration and cancellation options, and users have not reported any negative encounters.
Comparison Results: User reviews indicate that AWS GuardDuty is preferred over Trend Micro Cloud One. Reviewers liked GuardDuty's comprehensive monitoring capabilities and advanced threat response. Users find the setup process for GuardDuty to be simple and straightforward, whereas some users reported difficulties with Cloud One. GuardDuty also earned high marks for its reasonable pricing, but users say Trend Micro could lower the price of Cloud One to match competitors.
"PingSafe offers comprehensive security posture management."
"The offensive security feature is valuable because it publicly detects the offensive and vulnerable things present in our domain or applications. It checks any applications with public access. Some of the applications give public access to certain files or are present over a particular domain. It detects and lets us know with evidence. That is quite good. It is protecting our infrastructure quite well."
"We like the platform and its response time. We also like that its console is user-friendly as well as modern and sleek."
"The UI is very good."
"PingSafe has a dashboard that can detect the criticality of a particular problem, whether it falls under critical, medium, or low vulnerability."
"There's real-time threat detection. It can show threats and find issues based on their severity and helps us with real-time monitoring."
"Cloud Native Security is a tool that has good monitoring features."
"It is fairly simple. Anybody can use it."
"The product has automated protection powered by AI/ML, which is now far more powerful than before. It uses AI/ML in its detection algorithm, providing fast and quick results."
"The solution provides AWS GuardDuty S3 protection, EKS runtime protection, and malware protection."
"What I like most about Amazon GuardDuty is that you can monitor your AWS accounts across, but you don't have to pay the additional cost. You can get all your CloudTrail VPC flow logs and DNS logs all in one, and then you get the monitoring with that. A lot of times, if you had a separate tool on-premise, you would have to set up your DNS logs, so usually, Amazon GuardDuty helps with all your additional networking requirements, so I utilize it for continuous monitoring because you can't detect anything if you're not monitoring, and the solution fills that gap. If you don't do anything else first, you can deploy your firewall, and then you've got your Route 53 DNS and DNSSEC, but then Amazon GuardDuty fills that, and then you have audit requirements in AU that says, "Hey, what are your additional logs?", so you can just say, "Hey, we utilize Amazon GuardDuty." You're getting your CloudTrail, your VPC flow logs, and all your DNS logs, and those are your additional logs right there, so the solution meets a lot of requirements. Now, everything comes with a cost, but I also like that the solution also provides threat response and remediation. It's a pretty good product. I've just used it more for log analysis and that's where the value is at, the niche value. Once you do threat detection, it goes into a lot of other integrations you need to implement, so threat detection is only good as the integration, as the user that knows the tools itself, and the architecture and how it's all set up and the rules that you set within that."
"We use the tool for threat detection. AWS includes AI features as well. AWS GuardDuty gives us reports."
"We have over 1,000 employees, and we monitor their activity through AWS GuardDuty."
"It kinda just gives us another layer of security. So it does provide some sort of comfort that we do have something that is monitoring for abnormal behavior."
"The solution will detect abnormalities in the AWS workload and alert us so that we can monitor and take action."
"What we found most valuable in Amazon GuardDuty is its threat detection feature, especially because we were monitoring a huge number of AWS accounts, so we needed a solution that would monitor for any kind of malicious activity. The monitoring aspect of the solution was great because it gave us timely notifications if and when anything happened, and Amazon GuardDuty helped keep us on our toes to make sure we took action right away."
"The security is good."
"It has the best EDR functionality for cloud and typical endpoints."
"The perfect package for all security platforms, providing more than any other endpoint solution."
"The storage and computing features are valuable."
"The the most valuable feature is the scanning engine. It does not impact server performance. It's very lightweight."
"I like the conformity and workload security modules. Workload security is all about intrusion detection and prevention. Trend Vision One - Cloud Security has behavioral rules that are auto-populated based on organizational structure. That's one aspect that we liked most."
"The most valuable features are intrusion prevention and anti-malware capabilities."
"Trend Vision One - Cloud Security does not utilize a lot of resources which allows our users to keep working even during a scan."
"We are getting reports only in a predefined form. I would like to have customized reports so that I can see how many issues are open or closed today or in two weeks."
"In addition to our telecom and Slack channels, it would be helpful to receive Cloud Native Security security notifications in Microsoft Teams."
"There is a bit of a learning curve for new users."
"We'd like to have better notifications. We'd like them to happen faster."
"PingSafe takes four to five hours to detect and highlight an issue, and that time should be reduced."
"There's room for improvement in the graphic explorer."
"PingSafe can be improved by developing a comprehensive set of features that allow for automated workflows."
"Customized queries should be made easier to improve PingSafe."
"There is currently no consolidated dashboard for AWS GuardDuty. It would be helpful if they could provide a dashboard based on severity levels (high, medium, low) and offer insights account-wise, especially for users utilizing automation structures."
"We currently find Lacework to be much better at detecting vulnerabilities than AWS GuardDuty. The engines of AWS GuardDuty have to be improved."
"Improvement-wise, Amazon GuardDuty should have an overall dashboard analytics function so we could see what's in the current environment, and then in addition to that, provide best practices and recommendations, particularly to provide some type of observability, and then figure out the login side of it, based on our current environment, in terms of what we're not monitoring and what we should monitor. The solution should also give us a sample code configuration to implement that added feature or feature request. What I'd like to see in the next release of Amazon GuardDuty are more security analytics, reporting, and monitoring. They should provide recommendations and additional options that answer questions such as "Hey, what can we see in our environment?", "What should we implement within the environment?", What's recommended?" We know that cost will always be associated with that, but Amazon GuardDuty should show us the increased costs or decreased costs if we implement it or don't implement it, and that would be a good feature request, particularly with all products within AWS, just for cloud products in general because there are times features are implemented, but once they're deployed, they don't tell you about costs that would be generated along with those features. After features are deployed, there should a summary of the costs that would be generated, and projected based on current usage, so they would give us the option to figure out how long we're going to use those features and the option to keep those on or turn those off. If more services were like that, a lot more people would use those on the cloud."
"AWS GuardDuty needs to be more customer-oriented."
"Cost changes. It's very expensive. If you turn on every feature, it's more than most commercial vendors. For smaller orgs, that doesn't make sense."
"The solution's user interface could be improved because it will help users to understand multiple options."
"While sending the alerts to the email, they are not being patched. we have to do the patching and mapping manually. If GuardDuty could include a feature to do this automatically, it will make our job easier. That is something I believe can be improved."
"AWS GuardDuty sometimes shows false positives and should have better detection accuracy."
"The initial setup can be complex for the inexperienced."
"Securing S3 using Trend Vision One - Cloud Security can cost too much. Trend Vision One - Cloud Security has a tool that requires lots of privileges. From my understanding, it's only for static application testing, so they need to add dynamic application testing, and there should be more collaboration with the application testing tools on the market. We have not used this product, and I don't know if they plan to decommission it or something. They should focus on application security because this tool's unique feature is multi-cloud support. However, they should improve integration with tools for these kinds of use cases, especially application security and dynamic scanning. For example, I would like it to support Dell SecureOps. I'd also like to see some enhancements to API gateway security."
"The pricing can get high."
"One area for improvement in Trend Vision One - Cloud Security is marketing; in particular, Trend Vision should update the marketing documentation. The information needs to be more comprehensive."
"Documentation on cloud architecture and job architecture would be helpful."
"The product could use a little bit of automation."
"The firewall configuration should have been automated based on the understanding of the application, utilities, and protocols."
"Trend Vision One - Cloud Security should address threats automatically without having user input."
More SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Trend Vision One - Cloud Security Pricing and Cost Advice →
AWS GuardDuty is ranked 4th in Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) with 20 reviews while Trend Vision One - Cloud Security is ranked 7th in Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) with 17 reviews. AWS GuardDuty is rated 8.2, while Trend Vision One - Cloud Security is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of AWS GuardDuty writes "A stellar threat-detection service that has helped bolster security against malicious threats". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trend Vision One - Cloud Security writes "We can quickly deploy cloud conformity, provides good visibility, and control". AWS GuardDuty is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security, Wiz and Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform, whereas Trend Vision One - Cloud Security is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration, Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks and AWS Security Hub. See our AWS GuardDuty vs. Trend Vision One - Cloud Security report.
See our list of best Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
