We performed a comparison between Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks and Trend Micro Cloud One based on our users’ reviews in five categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Ease of Deployment: Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks has an easy setup with clear instructions and helpful engineers. Deployment is seamless, although the time may vary. On the other hand, Trend Micro Cloud One's setup can be difficult and time-consuming, requiring daily monitoring and maintenance, and it can take anywhere from a few hours to a month.
Features: Prisma Cloud offers a management console, compliance monitoring, and micro-segmentation, as well as auto-remediation capabilities and vulnerability scanning. Trend Micro Cloud One has excellent vulnerability protection and login inspection, as well as control over server access and application installation, and good workload management. Prisma Cloud needs more customizable dashboards, better automation, better coverage for GCP and Oracle, and improved support. Meanwhile, Trend Micro Cloud One needs improvements in pricing, Azure support, automation, robustness, initial setup, and alerts.
Pricing: Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks has a convoluted credit-based pricing model that can be difficult to comprehend, although it is deemed pricey, it is deemed a good investment for safeguarding multi-cloud setups. Meanwhile, Trend Micro Cloud One's pricing is in the mid-range and can be paid monthly, quarterly, or yearly. While extra services may accumulate, the overall cost is seen as fair and has even decreased by 25% in recent times.
Service and Support: Prisma Cloud has received mixed reviews, with some customers praising their technical support and account managers, while others experienced slow response times. Meanwhile, Trend Micro Cloud One has generally received positive feedback for their knowledgeable and responsive support team.
ROI: Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks provides better risk clarity, faster issue detection, improved compliance, and increased productivity compared to Trend Micro Cloud One. However, Trend Micro Cloud One is more flexible and easier to integrate.
Comparison Results: Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks is the preferred option over Trend Micro Cloud One based on user reviews. Prisma Cloud offers a wider range of features, including continuous cloud compliance monitoring, network security, and identity-based micro-segmentation, and provides a single pane of glass for multi- and hybrid-cloud environments.
"Our most important features are those around entitlement, external exposure, vulnerabilities, and container security."
"The first thing that stood out was the ease of installation and the quick value we got out of the solution."
"The product supports out-of-the-box reporting with context about the asset and allows us to perform complex custom queries on UI."
"With Wiz, we get timely alerts for leaked data or any vulnerabilities already existing in our environment."
"I like Wiz's reporting, and it's easy to do queries. For example, it's pretty simple to find out how many servers we have and the applications installed on each. I like Wiz's security graph because you can use it to see the whole organization even if you have multiple accounts."
"The solution is very user-friendly."
"Out of all the features, the one item that has been most valuable is the fact that Wiz puts into context all the pieces that create an issue, and applies a particular risk evaluation that helps us prioritize when we need to address a misconfiguration, vulnerability, or any issue that would put our environment into risk."
"The vulnerability management modules and the discovery and inventory are the most valuable features. Before using Wiz, it was a very manual process for both. After implementing it, we're able to get all of the analytics into a single platform that gives us visibility across all the systems in our cloud. We're able to correspond and understand what the vulnerability landscape looks like a lot faster."
"Most of the customers we are tackling have different tools and solutions, like Qualys, Nessus, and vulnerability management assessment solutions. There are plugins for them, and we can integrate Prisma Cloud with them. We can enrich our telemetry with their data and use the predefined correlation rules in Prisma Cloud. That means we have that work done in seconds."
"The solution gives us a lot of visibility across all of our cloud solutions."
"Prisma Cloud provides the needed visibility and control regardless of how complex and distributed the cloud environments become."
"The product is quite good for providing multi-clouds or cross-cloud security from a single-pane -of-glass."
"Cloud security posture management is the preferred feature among other vendors."
"The policies that come prepackaged in the tool have been very valuable to us. They're accurate and they provide good guidance as to why the policy was created, as well as how to remediate anything that violates the policy."
"I find the CSPM area to be a more valuable and flexible feature."
"We are provided with a single tool to protect all of our cloud resources and applications without having to manage and reconcile compliance reports."
"The most valuable features are intrusion prevention and anti-malware capabilities."
"Trend Vision One - Cloud Security does not utilize a lot of resources which allows our users to keep working even during a scan."
"I really like Trend Vision One - Cloud Security's dashboard."
"It has the best EDR functionality for cloud and typical endpoints."
"The most valuable part of Trend Vision One - Cloud Security is its dashboard, as it's simple. It's easy to manage, and you can better control the solution."
"The stability is quite good."
"Trend Vision One - Cloud Security's best features are security analysis, remote access security, and driver security."
"Virtual patching is one of the key features, which is executed with their IPS."
"Given the level of visibility into all the cloud environments Wiz provides, it would be nice if they could integrate some kind of mechanism to better manage tenants on multiple platforms. For example, let's say that some servers don't have an application they need, such as an antivirus. Wiz could include an API or something to push those applications out to the servers. It would be great if you could remedy these issues directly from the Wiz platform."
"The only thing that needs to be improved is the number of scans per day."
"The reporting isn't that great. They have executive summaries, but it's only a compliance report that maps all current issues to specific controls. Whether you look at one subscription or project, regardless of the size, you will get a multipage report on how the issues in that account map to that control. Our CSO isn't going to read through that. He won't filter that out or show that to his leadership and say, "Here's what we're doing." It isn't a helpful report. They're working on it, but it's a poor executive summary."
"Wiz's reporting capabilities could be refined a bit. They are making headway on that, but more executive-style dashboards would be nice. They just implemented a community aspect where you can share documents and feedback. This was something users had been requesting for a while. They are listening to customer feedback and making changes."
"The solution's container security could be improved."
"The remediation workflow within the Wiz could be improved."
"The only small pain point has been around some of the logging integrations. Some of the complexities of the script integrations aren't supported with some of the more automated infrastructure components. So, it's not as universal. For example, they have great support for cloud formation and other services, but if you're using another type of management utility or governance language for your infrastructure-as-code automation components, it becomes a little bit trickier to navigate that."
"We would like to see improvements to executive-level reporting and data reporting in general, which we understand is being rolled out to the platform."
"The automation must continue to become much smoother."
"Areas like the deployment of their defenders and their central control need manual intervention. They should focus more on automation. They have a very generic case for small companies. However, for bigger companies to work, we have to do a lot of changes to our system to accommodate it. Therefore, they should change their system or deployment models so it can be easy to integrate into existing architectures."
"Sometimes we do get false alerts. That should be improved."
"One thing that is missing is Cloud Run runtime security—serverless. That would be great to have in the tool. It's not that easy to have Cloud Run in specific environments."
"There is room for improvement on the logging and monitoring front because it's still not as holistic as I would want it to be."
"I would like to see the inclusion of automated counter-attack, although this is probably illegal."
"The UI could be improved."
"The automation capabilities are growing each day, but the problem is that the updates are not that frequent. There are some services on Amazon that have come out with updates, and Azure is also getting up to date. But Prisma takes some time to follow. There's a time gap that Prisma inherits from these clouds. I understand why it takes some time, but that time should be reduced."
"Trend Vision One - Cloud Security should address threats automatically without having user input."
"The dashboard should be a bit more intuitive."
"One area for improvement in Trend Vision One - Cloud Security is marketing; in particular, Trend Vision should update the marketing documentation. The information needs to be more comprehensive."
"Trend Vision One - Cloud Security could improve connections with different types of authentication and user groups concerning cloud services."
"They should provide a way for users to see violations for specific compliance."
"Trend Vision One - Cloud Security seems to have a preference for AWS Cloud over Azure and would be improved by focusing equally on both."
"There are also some loopholes because it's a new product that they have recently migrated to the cloud. We do see some issues with the policies we have assigned when it comes to a particular account. There are some issues with system support, such as a particular server kernel version that is not supported."
"The initial setup is easy for someone who operates container platforms on a daily basis. However, it could be difficult for those coming purely from informational security or another field of an IT."
More Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Trend Vision One - Cloud Security Pricing and Cost Advice →
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks is ranked 1st in Container Security with 82 reviews while Trend Vision One - Cloud Security is ranked 8th in Container Security with 17 reviews. Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks is rated 8.4, while Trend Vision One - Cloud Security is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks writes "The dashboard is very user-friendly and can be used to generate custom RQL based on user requirements". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trend Vision One - Cloud Security writes "We can quickly deploy cloud conformity, provides good visibility, and control". Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Aqua Cloud Security Platform, AWS Security Hub, CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security and AWS GuardDuty, whereas Trend Vision One - Cloud Security is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Cloud, AWS GuardDuty, Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration, AWS Security Hub and Orca Security. See our Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks vs. Trend Vision One - Cloud Security report.
See our list of best Container Security vendors, best Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) vendors, and best Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) vendors.
We monitor all Container Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
