We performed a comparison between Cisco Wireless and Mojo Networks based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Wireless LAN solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."You can easily monitor, manage, and cover all your IT equipment."
"The AI capabilities of Mist Wireless are superior to other OEMs."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is Marvis, the AI-driven network management system."
"Juniper Mist offers valuable features like comprehensive network insight, granular policy control, fast device setup, strong security, and efficient SSL traffic management."
"It provides private network access, helping us protect our company’s devices."
"The most valuable feature of Juniper Wireless Access Points (AP Series) is the ability to troubleshoot ports on the network. Additionally, when there is an update on the APs they are able to reboot quickly reducing downtime. Other solutions have a longer downtime when updates are done."
"In terms of reporting, in terms of all the user reports, it's very rich."
"The most valuable feature of Juniper Mist is the Virtual Network Assistant, powered by artificial intelligence."
"Cisco Wireless always has the latest technology that supports WiFi 5 and 6."
"The features that I have found most valuable with Cisco Wireless is that the average connectivity for this WIFI access point is 2.5 gigabytes. That's the highest technology and highest connectivity. They started using the new technology and WIFI to get you a faster connectivity."
"It is good, and it works."
"The product enables mobility and centralized control."
"Cisco has good support services."
"The support offered by Cisco is excellent. They are very responsive and knowledgeable."
"The solution offers very good stability."
"It is an extremely stable and scalable solution. Its documentation and support are also very good."
"The solution is very stable."
"The security is a valuable feature."
"It has given us a huge leg-up when competing with other managed service providers who use different vendors because of the visibility it gives us to customers' traffic for troubleshooting purposes."
"The fact that they are autonomous and can function even without access to the management panel is the most valuable aspect of this solution."
"The features that I like the most are the visibility and the firewall, which is very good."
"Mojo Networks (Arista WiFi) is extremely secure with WIPS, built-in wireless."
"Built-in guest analytics and advanced guest portal features allow our customers to create a guest experience which is typically only available with complex and expensive third-party software."
"It is a hundred percent scalable product since its functionalities are good...It is a very stable product."
"Enrolling into the tool is a tedious process."
"The pricing is very high in the Indian market."
"Improvement is needed in the user-friendliness of Juniper Mist, particularly in enhancing the interaction with AI features."
"They should include SD-WAN features to it."
"The solution is expensive."
"Juniper Wireless AP can improve by continually improving its reporting and integration with other systems."
"The pricing should be made cheaper."
"I need a bit more time with it before criticizing the features."
"The media stream and Mojo settings are not sufficiently supported."
"I would like to see less dependency on other products such as ISE and Prime for certain implementations."
"The new licensing has no added value and seems to be Cisco's effort to take advantage of customers."
"Sometimes, in some rooms the signal could be a bit better, a little stronger."
"They should introduce zero interference capabilities."
"Cisco won't work with any other vendors. That is a significant problem with Cisco."
"Sometimes I've seen some issues come up with the interference. That's an issue users face at times. It becomes very complex when you have a lot of wireless interference in the area, or in your office. It's because of the environment of Cisco. Maybe, in the future, they can work on this area, and fix this issue."
"In the next release, I would like to have support for Wi-Fi 6."
"I would like to have a single pane of glass to better control the access point and the switching."
"Compared to other OEMs, Mojo Networks or Arista faces a little bit of coverage issues. So, if we put the same dBm, the power of the other OEMs indicates much more extensive coverage compared to Mojo or Arista."
"My only complaint about this product is its availability. Not many people can stock it and ordering from overseas is a challenge."
"The renewal costs that come with it are very expensive."
"The RF signalling and data analytics parts should be improved."
"Further expanding the API and access to even more diagnostics, as I have found a few limitations when I am dealing with them right now."
"Needs greater simplicity in the management portal. Currently, the Mojo portal presents different “apps” to configure the devices, create splash pages, configure security settings, and monitor the network. This can be confusing, although Mojo has made great strides in combining these into “Aware”."
"The user interface needs improvement. It could be a little bit more user-friendly."
More Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points Pricing and Cost Advice →
Cisco Wireless is ranked 2nd in Wireless LAN with 147 reviews while Mojo Networks is ranked 20th in Wireless LAN with 16 reviews. Cisco Wireless is rated 8.2, while Mojo Networks is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Cisco Wireless writes "Allows us to deploy a wide range of wireless products with stable WiFi". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Mojo Networks writes "The product is easy to deploy since it can be done seamlessly with zero testing ". Cisco Wireless is most compared with Aruba Wireless, Ruckus Wireless, Ubiquiti WLAN, Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN and Omada Access Points, whereas Mojo Networks is most compared with Mist AI and Cloud, Aruba Wireless and Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN. See our Cisco Wireless vs. Mojo Networks report.
See our list of best Wireless LAN vendors.
We monitor all Wireless LAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
