We performed a comparison between Dynatrace and Falcon LogScale based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Splunk, Wazuh, Datadog and others in Log Management."The most valuable feature is the ability to perform synthetic checks for monitoring sites using click paths."
"The most useful features are cloud monitoring, application monitoring, and alert notifications."
"It used to take a lot of time to troubleshoot. Now, we can actually see the logs anytime we want. I can just find the problem. It has improved performance from a time perspective."
"Service discovery with artificial intelligence automatic anomaly root cause detection, and problems replay."
"The linking is very good in Dynatrace. What happens in other monitoring tools is the linking is not proper. In those solutions, a person has to manually link many of the layers and what is happening in them, while in Dynatrace you get that from the very first visit. For example, if a person is visiting your website, from there it will traverse you to the end. If the application is a Java application, it will traverse you there, to the Method level. So that linking and traversing is better in Dynatrace."
"We are able to prevent the major downtimes by proactive monitoring alerts."
"Reduced MTTR, thanks to smart problem detection and automated root cause analysis."
"The Transaction Flow diagram and the class and meta level information, those are really key selling points in the automation for AppMon. Also, the meta level instrumentation and the dashboards that most of the people use in our organization."
"It offers the capability to view live log ingestion directly from the console which means you can seamlessly manage live log data ingestion alongside accessing and analyzing older data from the past."
"They need better infrastructure monitoring. New Relic is beating them for infrastructure monitoring."
"I would like a testing module focused on quality gates."
"Whenever there is a new version the UI changes, it makes it hard to use, because we are accustomed to the old one."
"Two things that can be improved are the licensing and the Business dashboard."
"Configuring nodes and agents should be more like plug and play."
"We have a very stringent budget for an infrastructure solution. Maybe if they provided modules, a simple module with fewer features and a lower price, that would be very good."
"I would like better plugin support, because they are constantly asking us to do plugins, saying "Yeah, we can do that. Use this plugin." Then, the moment something goes wrong with that plugin, I have no way of getting help."
"Its pricing could be better. Dynatrace has an option to monitor the end users to see what they are doing, but it required a separate license and had an additional cost. It was coming out to be expensive, because of which we didn't use the feature."
"There are some overlapping features found in multiple tools."
Dynatrace is ranked 4th in Log Management with 342 reviews while Falcon LogScale is ranked 34th in Log Management with 1 review. Dynatrace is rated 8.8, while Falcon LogScale is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Dynatrace writes "AI identifies all the components of a response-time issue or failure, hugely benefiting our triage efforts". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Falcon LogScale writes "A highly commendable and robust solution offering powerful features and comprehensive log data management". Dynatrace is most compared with Datadog, New Relic, AppDynamics, Splunk Enterprise Security and Azure Monitor, whereas Falcon LogScale is most compared with Elastic Stack, Splunk Enterprise Security, Grafana Loki, LogRhythm SIEM and Logpoint.
See our list of best Log Management vendors.
We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
