We performed a comparison between ExtremeWireless and Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Wireless LAN solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."In terms of the most valuable features, I like the integration with the fabric. The network fabric completely integrates with wireless as well."
"The product's price is competitive. It is an impressive and reliable product."
"I like Cloud IQ, ExtremeWireless' cloud controller and analytics platform. It's full of information, easy to use, and provides excellent visibility into my network."
"The technical support from Extreme Networks is perfect."
"The security is very good."
"The stability of the solution has been fine."
"The wireless security solution is the most valuable feature of ExtremeWireless."
"The most valuable feature is stability."
"The most useful feature of Juniper Wireless AP is the reporting Marvis."
"The most valuable feature of Juniper Mist is the Virtual Network Assistant, powered by artificial intelligence."
"The solution is pretty generic and easy to use."
"It provides private network access, helping us protect our company’s devices."
"Juniper Mist offers valuable features like comprehensive network insight, granular policy control, fast device setup, strong security, and efficient SSL traffic management."
"You can easily monitor, manage, and cover all your IT equipment."
"With Mist, every Wednesday they roll out new features."
"The solution is very secure."
"The onsite controllers are not as good as the cloud controller. I would also like ExtremeWireless to add web filtering on the access point. This feature is available from other vendors but not ExtremeWireless."
"ExtremeWireless support isn't very good."
"ExtremeWireless should fix some general bugs and make the user interface more user-friendly."
"The troubleshooting feature for the cloud version is challenging."
"The solution needs to improve its portfolio."
"The solution must include integrated IoT solutions on their wireless APs."
"The cost is a little high."
"They could provide different product models. Additionally, there could be a feature to manage devices."
"Enrolling into the tool is a tedious process."
"The price could be better."
"They should include SD-WAN features to it."
"I need a bit more time with it before criticizing the features."
"It would be helpful to have even stronger security features to help protect against interference from other nearby access points that aren't part of our network."
"Improvement is needed in the user-friendliness of Juniper Mist, particularly in enhancing the interaction with AI features."
"Improving third-party integration is key for Juniper Mist's next release."
"Juniper Wireless AP can improve by continually improving its reporting and integration with other systems."
More Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points Pricing and Cost Advice →
ExtremeWireless is ranked 13th in Wireless LAN with 21 reviews while Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points is ranked 10th in Wireless LAN with 16 reviews. ExtremeWireless is rated 8.0, while Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of ExtremeWireless writes "An easy to deploy solution that can scale and expand". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points writes "Offers good performance, good solution and smooth implementation ". ExtremeWireless is most compared with Ruckus Wireless, Aruba Wireless, Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN, ExtremeCloud IQ and Juniper EX Series Ethernet Switches, whereas Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points is most compared with Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN, Aruba Wireless, Ruckus Wireless, Cisco Wireless and Huawei Wireless. See our ExtremeWireless vs. Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points report.
See our list of best Wireless LAN vendors.
We monitor all Wireless LAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.