We performed a comparison between JenniferSoft and New Relic based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability."The dashboard is a valuable feature."
"It has in-depth analysis using developer code for someone whose not traditionally a developer."
"The solution is quite stable."
"We appreciate the way that this solution allows us to monitor the ongoing status of the UI at any given time."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to receive in-depth information about applications. It can detect a lot of important information."
"The most valuable features are the dashboards and tracing."
"The most valuable feature is the New Relic APM module to deep-dive into the application, to get bottlenecks to the surface, and to improve application performance. Also, the New Relic Insights module creates a real-time dashboard on application performance to create awareness for the DevOps team."
"It is a software solution as a service, so I don't have to manage it on-premise."
"The most valuable feature of New Relic APM is the dashboard, New Relic Insights. I configured my own dashboard to monitor certain parameters."
"The solution is pricy and has room for improvement."
"Documentation could be improved in New Relic APM, so users would have more clarity on configuring the dashboard. If New Relic gave better guidelines, users would find it easier to understand the metrics and features of New Relic APM. Another area for improvement is integration with Kubernetes. Currently, the process isn't user-friendly. It's challenging and lacks documentation for users to understand how to integrate New Relic APM with Kubernetes quickly. With multiple levels of Kubernetes dockers and other DBs on different clouds, it's tricky to gather all into New Relic APM on a single dashboard. What I'd like to see in the next version of New Relic APM is a single dashboard where you can easily view which applications fall under specific APMs. If there's a search feature where you can type in a keyword to find out if an APM is related to a particular application, that would be great."
"The integration and configuration of this product in our AWS environment needs improvement on the filtering part. I would like it to go more granular on accounts."
"New Relic APM can improve the information when we dig deeper to check a problem. There should be more detailed information provided."
"The solution should include more detailed reports for SQL database requests."
"The price needs improvement."
"New Relic APM could improve error debugging and the correlation with the logs. We are receiving some alerts or alarms but we need to correlate with the error log, but it is difficult if it is more than seven months retention period, it is hard to trace. We need this especially for getting historical information."
"The price could improve."
"I would like if it could have predictive analysis. Today, we only have the option to configure thresholds."
JenniferSoft is ranked 52nd in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 1 review while New Relic is ranked 3rd in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 152 reviews. JenniferSoft is rated 8.0, while New Relic is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of JenniferSoft writes "Easy to deploy, stable, and scalable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of New Relic writes "Has a simple user interface and end-to-end monitoring and self-healing features". JenniferSoft is most compared with Grafana, whereas New Relic is most compared with Dynatrace, Datadog, Elastic Observability, Grafana and Prometheus.
See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.