We performed a comparison between LogMeIn Central and N-able N-central based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Remote access is really the biggest one, because in order to be able to support my clients from wherever I am, that is the biggest feature."
"Using the product, we provide a quicker response when supporting customers."
"The ability to manipulate and do things to the computer and file manager, then boot to safe mode, and see what is going on and track alerts. I use it all."
"For me, it's convenience because I cover three different offices, and I need to be able to remotely access any of those three offices from anywhere, anytime. With LogMeIn Central, I can do that."
"The initial setup was very easy."
"It is a scalable solution."
"It allows you to transfer along with many other functions."
"I have called for help to their technical support, and they have been extremely helpful."
"The solution's service is good."
"The support is at a good level. So normally, we can always get to a solution when we are stuck with some monitoring problems that we encounter."
"The most valuable feature of N-able N-central is the many options it has."
"It's a very robust product. They're continuing to invest and put new enhancements into the product. They're very open about what their roadmap is, which is very good for us because then as a business, we can plan."
"I like the remote connectivity, reporting suite, and patch management module."
"File transfer on the free version needs improvement. Allow file transfer with drag and drop to and from Remote Desktop. "
"It's not really a true RMM product but more of just a remote access."
"The initial load is terribly slow and often has delays with the login page loading."
"Sometimes it just fails to load."
"There are some screens that are just ugly and difficult to manipulate."
"The screen. Make it clearer. The screen resolutions don't always line up. So clarity of the screen, and speed."
"I have had issues where LogMeIn has not been useful, then we have not been able to work that day. This happens probably two or three times a year."
"Our clients are having issues with printing."
"There is room for improvement in the development of custom monitoring services."
"The integration with other applications could be better."
"The solution's overall integration should be improved."
"N-able N-central could improve the remote access, my technicians have complained about it. They have used other free tools instead to compensate, such as TeamViewer. Additionally, when using remote access on the web, it is lacking reports."
"The support from our direct team is very good, but the support from their day-to-day ongoing help desk isn't that good. They have still got some work to do on that, but they have been focusing on that a lot over the last number of years. So, it has gotten a lot better than it was."
LogMeIn Central is ranked 10th in Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) with 19 reviews while N-able N-central is ranked 5th in Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) with 5 reviews. LogMeIn Central is rated 8.6, while N-able N-central is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of LogMeIn Central writes "Fast with an easy setup and a good interface". On the other hand, the top reviewer of N-able N-central writes "User-friendly graphical user interface and offers versatile functionality". LogMeIn Central is most compared with TeamViewer, NinjaOne, Microsoft Configuration Manager, Atera and LogMeIn Rescue, whereas N-able N-central is most compared with N-able N-sight Remote Monitoring & Management, NinjaOne, Atera, ConnectWise Automate and Kaseya VSA. See our LogMeIn Central vs. N-able N-central report.
See our list of best Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) vendors.
We monitor all Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
