We compared Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio and TensorFlow based on our user's reviews in several parameters.
In summary, Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio is praised for its user-friendly interface, seamless integration with other Azure services, reliable performance, and excellent support and documentation. On the other hand, TensorFlow is valued for its versatility, efficiency, extensive library of tools, and user-friendly interface. Users appreciate the flexible pricing options of both platforms, with Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio offering reasonable setup costs and TensorFlow providing a variety of pricing options suited to different needs. However, users have identified areas for improvement in both platforms, such as enhancing the user interface and documentation for Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio, and improving ease of use, documentation, and performance optimization for TensorFlow.
Features: Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio is praised for its user-friendly interface, extensive range of tools and algorithms, seamless integration with Azure services, reliable and scalable performance, and excellent support and documentation. On the other hand, TensorFlow is highly valued for its versatility, usability, efficiency, extensive library of tools and functions, flexibility in building and training deep learning models, user-friendly interface, well-documented resources, efficient utilization of hardware resources, and pre-built models, algorithms, and visualization tools.
Pricing and ROI: The setup cost for Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio is reasonable, with users finding the licensing process straightforward. In comparison, TensorFlow offers flexible pricing options suited to different needs, with a straightforward setup cost that users find hassle-free. TensorFlow's licensing is perceived as fair and transparent, instilling confidence in its usage., User feedback indicates positive ROI for both Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio and TensorFlow. Azure ML Studio is praised for its reliability, user-friendliness, and seamless data integration, while TensorFlow users have reported significant value and favorable outcomes.
Room for Improvement: Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio could improve its user interface to be more user-friendly. It also needs better documentation and collaboration features. In contrast, TensorFlow could enhance its ease of use, installation process, and performance. It should provide more comprehensive tutorials, visualization capabilities, and debugging tools.
Deployment and customer support: In the user reviews for Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio, there is variability in the reported durations for deployment, setup, and implementation. Some users mention different time frames for these phases, while others suggest they occur within the same period. However, user reviews for TensorFlow indicate a wider range of durations, with deployment taking a few weeks or a month, and setup ranging from a few days to a month. This suggests that Azure Machine Learning Studio may have a more consistent or efficient process for establishing a new tech solution compared to TensorFlow., Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio offers excellent assistance and guidance, with prompt and efficient support. Users praise the reliable and knowledgeable customer service. TensorFlow also provides highly praised customer service, ensuring prompt and helpful responses and a knowledgeable support staff.
The summary above is based on 29 interviews we conducted recently with Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio and TensorFlow users. To access the review's full transcripts, download our report.
"The solution is integrated with our Microsoft Azure tenant, and we don't have to go anywhere else outside the tenant."
"The learning curve is very low. Operationalizing the model is also very easy within the Azure ecosystem."
"Azure Machine Learning Studio's most valuable features are the package from Azure AutoML. It is quite powerful compared to the building of ML in Databricks or other AutoMLs from other companies, such as Google and Amazon."
"The ability to do the templating and be able to transfer it so that I can easily do multiple types of models and data mining is a valuable aspect of this solution. You only have to set up the flows, the templates, and the data once and then you can make modifications and test different segmentations throughout."
"I like that it's totally easy to use. They have an AutoML solution, and their machine learning model is highly accurate. They also have a feature that can explain the machine learning model. This makes it easy for me to understand that model."
"When you import the dataset you can see the data distribution easily with graphics and statistical measures."
"In terms of what I found most valuable in Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio, I especially love the designer because you can just drag and drop items there and apply the logic that's already available with the designer. I love that I can use the libraries in Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio, so I don't have to search for the algorithms and all the relevant libraries because I can see them directly on the designer just by dragging and dropping. Though there's a bit of work during data cleansing, that's normal and can't be avoided. At least it's easy to find the relevant algorithm, apply that algorithm to the data, then get the desired output through Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio. I also like the API feature of the solution which is readily available for me to expose the output to any consuming application, so that takes out a lot of headache. Otherwise, I have to have a developer who knows the API, and I have to have an API app, so all that is completely taken care of by the Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio designer. With the solution, I can concentrate on how to improve the data quality to get quality recommendations, so this lets me concentrate on my job rather than focusing on the regular development of APIs or the pipelines, in particular, the data pipelines pulling the data from other sources. All the data is taken care of and you can also concentrate on other required auxiliary activities rather than just concentrating on machine learning."
"The solution is really scalable."
"It provides us with 35 features like patch normalization layers, and it is easy to implement using the Kras library when the Kaspersky flow is running behind it."
"TensorFlow is a framework that makes it really easy to use for deep learning."
"TensorFlow improves my organization because our clients get a lot of investment from their investors and we are progressively improving the products. Every six months we release new features."
"Google is behind TensorFlow, and they provide excellent documentation. It's very thorough and very helpful."
"TensorFlow provides Insights into both data and machine learning strategies."
"Edge computing has some limited resources but TensorFlow has been improving in its features. It is a great tool for developers."
"It empowers us to seamlessly create and deploy machine learning models, offering a versatile solution for implementing sophisticated environments and various types of AI solutions."
"Optimization is very good in TensorFlow. There are many opportunities to do hyper-parameter training."
"There's room for improvement in terms of binding the integration with Azure DevOps."
"The solution's initial setup process is complicated."
"The data preparation capabilities need to be improved."
"It would be great if the solution integrated Microsoft Copilot, its AI helper."
"I think it should be made cheaper for certain people…It may appear costlier for those who don't consider time important."
"The solution should be more customizable. There should be more algorithms."
"As for the areas for improvement in Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio, I've provided feedback to Microsoft. My company is a Gold Partner of Microsoft, so I provided my feedback in another forum. Right now, it is the number of algorithms available in the designer that has to be improved, though I'm sure Microsoft does it regularly. When you take a use case approach, Microsoft has done that in a lot of places, but not on the Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio designer. When I say use case basis, I meant recommending a product or recommending similar products, so if Microsoft can list out use cases and give me a template, it will save me a lot of time and a lot of work because I don't have to scratch my head on which algorithm is better, and I can go with what's recommended by Microsoft. I'm sure that isn't a big task for the Microsoft team who must have seen thousands of use cases already, so out of that experience if the team can come up with a standard template, I'm sure it'll help a lot of organizations cut down on the development time, as well as going with the best industry-standard algorithms rather than experimenting with mine. What I'd like to see in the next version of Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio, apart from the use case template, is the improvement of the availability of libraries. Microsoft should also upgrade the Python versions because the old version of Python is still supported and it takes time for Microsoft to upgrade the support for Python. The pace of upgrading Python versions of Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio and making those libraries available should be sped up or increased."
"The interface is a bit overloaded."
"In terms of improvement, we always look for ways they can optimize the model, accelerate the speed and the accuracy, and how can we optimize with our different techniques. There are various techniques available in TensorFlow. Maintaining accuracy is an area they should work on."
"JavaScript is a different thing and all the websites and web apps and all the mobile apps are built-in JavaScript. JavaScript is the core of that. However, TensorFlow is like a machine learning item. What can be improved with TensorFlow is how it can mix in how the JavaScript developers can use TensorFlow."
"It would be cool if TensorFlow could make it easier for companies like us to program for running it across different hyperscalers."
"TensorFlow deep learning takes a lot of computation power. The more systems you can use, the easier it is. That's a good ability, if you can make a system run immediately at the same time on the same task, it's much faster rather than you having one system running which is slower. Running systems in parallel is a complex situation, but it can improve. There is a lot of work involved."
"Personally, I find it to be a bit too much AI-oriented."
"TensorFlow Lite only outputs to C."
"For newcomers to the field, the learning curve can be steep, often requiring about a year of dedicated effort."
"It doesn't allow for fast the proto-typing. So usually when we do proto-typing we will start with PyTorch and then once we have a good model that we trust, we convert it into TensorFlow. So definitely, TensorFlow is not very flexible."
More Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio Pricing and Cost Advice →
Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio is ranked 1st in AI Development Platforms with 53 reviews while TensorFlow is ranked 4th in AI Development Platforms with 16 reviews. Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio is rated 7.6, while TensorFlow is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio writes "Good support for Azure services in pipelines, but deploying outside of Azure is difficult". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TensorFlow writes "Effective deep learning, free to use, and highly stable". Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio is most compared with Google Vertex AI, Databricks, Azure OpenAI, Google Cloud AI Platform and Dataiku, whereas TensorFlow is most compared with Google Vertex AI, OpenVINO, IBM Watson Machine Learning, Hugging Face and Azure OpenAI. See our Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio vs. TensorFlow report.
See our list of best AI Development Platforms vendors.
We monitor all AI Development Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
