We performed a comparison between Mojo Networks and Ruckus Wireless based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Wireless LAN solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."You can easily monitor, manage, and cover all your IT equipment."
"Juniper Mist offers valuable features like comprehensive network insight, granular policy control, fast device setup, strong security, and efficient SSL traffic management."
"In terms of reporting, in terms of all the user reports, it's very rich."
"Overall, we've been very pleased with the performance."
"The simplicity is great."
"The solution is very secure."
"The artificial intelligence feature is very good."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is Marvis, the AI-driven network management system."
"The features that I like the most are the visibility and the firewall, which is very good."
"The cloud-based architecture of the controller is valuable because it obviously saves on my hardware costs."
"It is a hundred percent scalable product since its functionalities are good...It is a very stable product."
"The fact that they are autonomous and can function even without access to the management panel is the most valuable aspect of this solution."
"The technical support for the solution is very helpful."
"Built-in guest analytics and advanced guest portal features allow our customers to create a guest experience which is typically only available with complex and expensive third-party software."
"The initial setup was easy."
"We have found Mojo to be critical for us because of its patented security and its wireless intrusion prevention system (WIPS). It is unique in the market."
"I like the price and its capacity."
"Its high capacity is the most valuable. It is also very stable. It is way more stable than other platforms."
"The most valuable feature for me is reliability."
"Performance-wise, it's great."
"They have all the features in terms of wireless technology. They have most of the features already there in the controller and their wireless system."
"Zero-handoff is one of the top features. The client balancing between the access points is good. Its security is also fine."
"Ruckus Wireless provides good coverage."
"Analyzes real-time, in-depth network performance."
"The solution is expensive."
"If you want to do more specific stuff, it's a bit limited."
"Enrolling into the tool is a tedious process."
"Improvement is needed in the user-friendliness of Juniper Mist, particularly in enhancing the interaction with AI features."
"The price could be better."
"The product should include adaptive Wi-Fi to show a more accurate location."
"I need a bit more time with it before criticizing the features."
"Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points’ support services need improvement."
"My only complaint about this product is its availability. Not many people can stock it and ordering from overseas is a challenge."
"The solution is a bit pricier than Cisco."
"The RF signalling and data analytics parts should be improved."
"They could use more additional application security and network security features. They could add on to the WiFi as a selling point. It would be nice to be able to say to the WiFi users, "We will protect you against viruses and malware, so you don't have to purchase that.""
"The implementation could be simplified. Right now it's a bit complex."
"The customer service and support took a lot of time to come on the troubleshooting call."
"I would like to have a single pane of glass to better control the access point and the switching."
"Further expanding the API and access to even more diagnostics, as I have found a few limitations when I am dealing with them right now."
"Its security can be improved. It doesn't use Wireless IPS. Therefore, we have to combine WatchGuard that uses a Wireless IPS but is a separate solution. These two solutions work in conjunction. We are using the WatchGuard as a sensor and Wireless IPS, and Ruckus is like a platform that is used for the connectivity of the network."
"We use this solution in a certain way, and it works very well. So, I don't expect it to do a lot more, but to do what it's doing probably better or faster. But it's not a problem with the features; it's more the operations."
"In the next release of this solution, I would like to see a more detailed spectrum analysis."
"The interface should be mobile friendly."
"The solution needs to have some sort of security offering, like a firewall, for example."
"They lack in some hardware stratification."
"The solution currently lacks the integration of security services."
"One area where Ruckus Wireless could improve is its technical support."
More Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points Pricing and Cost Advice →
Mojo Networks is ranked 20th in Wireless LAN with 17 reviews while Ruckus Wireless is ranked 3rd in Wireless LAN with 97 reviews. Mojo Networks is rated 8.2, while Ruckus Wireless is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Mojo Networks writes "The product is easy to deploy since it can be done seamlessly with zero testing ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Ruckus Wireless writes "Great wireless, good reliability, and excellent connectivity". Mojo Networks is most compared with Mist AI and Cloud, Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN, Aruba Wireless and Cisco Wireless, whereas Ruckus Wireless is most compared with Aruba Wireless, Cisco Wireless, Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN, Ubiquiti WLAN and ExtremeWireless. See our Mojo Networks vs. Ruckus Wireless report.
See our list of best Wireless LAN vendors.
We monitor all Wireless LAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
