We performed a comparison between NetXMS and Zabbix based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, Datadog, Auvik and others in Network Monitoring Software."We can manage the entire system across the network and troubleshoot the pain points."
"We have a large network spanning over 1000 kilometers. NetXMS provides visibility and sends alerts. Typically, most monitoring systems monitor every 60 seconds, but NetXMS allows us to adjust this. For critical links, we can set it to check every second. For our high-priority financial customers, we monitor every second. So, every three seconds, we receive another email and a Telegram alert. This helps us meet our SLAs (Service Level Agreements) with our high-priority customers."
"The most valuable features of Zabbix are flexibility and a single interface for different types of monitoring."
"Our customers also like that they don't have to use multiple modules. Micro Focus and major vendors typically require you to buy several modules and plugins. Our customers do not like that. We offer them a single product for all their monitoring needs."
"Simple network monitoring that is easy to install and manage."
"The integration with third-party tools and the alerts are most valuable."
"Every new asset placed in the environment can be automatically detected, predicting human failures."
"It's a flexible solution."
"Zabbix is both stable and scalable."
"The most valuable feature is service assurance."
"The Wi-Fi side needs improvement."
"Based on my experience, there should be options for using the latest communication methods, like social media integration. Telegram is already integrated, but SMS and other alert options would be beneficial. So, integrating social media notifications into NetXMS would be a good thing."
"When we have a problem, we have to do a lot of research to solve it."
"Documentation terminology could be improved."
"Zabbix isn't very good at automation just yet."
"Implementing Zabbix is difficult. I've deployed many solutions over the years, and Zabbix is the hardest to implement. You have to do some development to get it to work with IBM, Micro Focus, or HP products."
"The only improvement I would suggest, revolves around its AI and ML capabilities."
"The solution needs to add remote features."
"The main problem with Zabbix is that you have to spend time writing templates for all of the products that you have."
"Outside of the normal standard monitoring, I would like to extend patching, importing patching, and supporting patching for Windows Servers."
NetXMS is ranked 44th in Network Monitoring Software with 1 review while Zabbix is ranked 1st in Network Monitoring Software with 101 reviews. NetXMS is rated 10.0, while Zabbix is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of NetXMS writes "Offers custom monitoring functionality, user-friendly interface, custom maps feature and open source". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Zabbix writes "Allows any number of customizations but lacks functionality for finding root causes". NetXMS is most compared with PRTG Network Monitor, whereas Zabbix is most compared with Centreon, Checkmk, SolarWinds NPM, Nagios Core and Nagios XI.
See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.
We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.