We performed a comparison between NTT-AT WinActor and UiPath based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Robotic Process Automation (RPA) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."This software is very smart - it can decide from a picture if we like that condition, and then the robot will do that action."
"The tool's most valuable feature is data import. The OCR feature helps to recognize the data. It can recognize screen and document numbers well."
"We used the AI Fabric functionality in one of our projects. We had to categorize users' reviews based on the sentiment scores. Everything was already available, including the model. So, we just have to click on all those things from UiPath now."
"The unattended, back-office robots are the most beneficial feature."
"UiPath is user-friendly."
"We leverage the whole platform. The tool's most valuable features are unattended and attended robots."
"Look into the data web scraping. I don't think another tool has that feature and we use it a lot. Data web scraping was probably the bonus of why we went with UiPath."
"The most valuable aspect of UiPath is that it doesn't require much coding."
"This solution has increased productivity in our organization."
"Implementing AI in our automation has significantly enhanced the accuracy of our operations."
"Something that could be improved is that this solution can't run when the computer is locked, which meant we had to implement it in our own on-prem server as it never auto-locks."
"The OCR has issues recognizing handwritten data."
"I would like to see more support for the cloud in Australia."
"The built-in OCR is only 60% to 70% correct if you're analyzing a PDF that has images in it, so this is an area that can be improved."
"They could always continue to add new features, however, I don't have anything specific in mind right now."
"UiPath is relatively expensive."
"Some of the documentation that UiPath has around the technical specifications, from a security perspective, are very factual and comprehensive, but they don't have an audience, like CIOs who need to approve this solution. Therefore, the documentation is one area where I might smooth the process out a bit, since the audience is different from the way the documentation is written as technical specifications."
"I would like to see improved support and cost management for advanced certification."
"UiPath should improve its licensing structure."
"Many of the features that UiPath has are good, although better documentation is required for them."
NTT-AT WinActor is ranked 27th in Robotic Process Automation (RPA) with 2 reviews while UiPath is ranked 1st in Robotic Process Automation (RPA) with 763 reviews. NTT-AT WinActor is rated 7.0, while UiPath is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of NTT-AT WinActor writes "Frees up employee time but can't run when computer system is locked". On the other hand, the top reviewer of UiPath writes "Facilitates end-to-end automation, has good AI and document understanding capabilities, and saves us costs previously spent on manual tasks". NTT-AT WinActor is most compared with Microsoft Power Automate, whereas UiPath is most compared with Microsoft Power Automate, Automation Anywhere (AA), Blue Prism, Robocorp and Pega Robotic Process Automation. See our NTT-AT WinActor vs. UiPath report.
See our list of best Robotic Process Automation (RPA) vendors.
We monitor all Robotic Process Automation (RPA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
