We performed a comparison between Tricentis Tosca and UiPath Test Suite based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Test Automation Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The low code is the best feature."
"We can also create customized functions. For example, if something isn't supported in Tricentis Tosca Commander, we can create our own function to integrate it with Tosca Commander, so we can utilize it and integrate with the macros."
"The item that is different from all the other tools is that it's module based."
"The Model-Based Test Automation is the most valuable feature, where you can create reusable components. Even though we are using a scriptless automation tool, there still needs to be an understanding of how to create reusable components and how to keep refactoring and how to keep regression, the test scripts, at an okay level. We are coupling Tosca with some other risk-based testing tools, as well, but automation is primarily what we're using Tosca for, the scriptless, model-based technology which is driving automation for us."
"I am impressed with the product's script test."
"You can quickly build automated testing, manage it, and have it run on a regular basis to ensure that there are no issues."
"Very user-friendly and the low code automation is really helpful."
"Good use in Agile workshops, where the person needs to conceptualize the tests before the developer provides the complete application interface."
"Being able to use regular expressions, activities, and attributes is valuable."
"Our team used to require five to six days to complete the entire release or execution cycle. Now, we're able to complete it within just one or one and a half days."
"In terms of integration with other lifecycle tools and applications, UiPath Test Suite works very well because of the basis of RPA, and how RPA and automation can handle different applications and different areas of expertise."
"Test Suite has multiple tools that are fully integrated. It has everything you need to record your test cases, generate your documentation, and integrate synthetic data with your Orchestrator. I like the integrated aspect of it. The biggest advantage of UiPath is that it not only tests but also integrates with all the other services to offer a complete package."
"The document understanding is good."
"UiPath's tools are generally designed for business users, so they can be as simple or as complex as needed."
"The console, in a single pane, allows us to understand where we are in the testing environment."
"It's useful for automating tasks."
"Very difficult to get information about licensing costs."
"It needs better integration with JIRA."
"The tool lags in client-based applications. We have also encountered issues with the features in integrations."
"Their license management should be improved. One of our customers is a global customer. They want to use one licensed server and then split the licenses based on the different users of the different business units, but currently, there is only one license server that everybody can access. There is no control, and that's why sometimes congestion can happen."
"Might have a learning curve, as it does not follow the traditional Record-Play functionality, but tests have to be built from requirements or Agile story cards."
"It can be quite expensive."
"They need to improve on the reports after the execution of automation tests, since all the current organizations are looking for detailed graphical reports."
"Security, UI, and basic performance improvements could be done to the product to enhance its use."
"Our primary application is built on Windows, so we've faced no significant challenges. However, I think mobile automation is one area where the solution still needs some work."
"The product releases sometimes have issues."
"At FORWARD VI, we see new automations being built around AI and the ability to have developers understand how they can drive some of those AI capabilities with Studio. We are starting to see that. They should also drive that with UiPath Test Suite so that we can not only build that development side faster; we can also develop the tests that go along with it, hopefully automatically."
"Storing the test scripts is what needs to improve in the UiPath Test Suite, as it's currently a challenge to some extent. Maintaining the files is a bit challenging, especially when you need to keep those locally."
"UiPath could further enhance its functionality by simplifying the test case creation process within Test Suite."
"They could improve the visualization of the product."
"UiPath needs to improve its Test Manager feature. Defect management and reporting also need improvement."
"The test manager component could be improved."
Tricentis Tosca is ranked 1st in Test Automation Tools with 98 reviews while UiPath Test Suite is ranked 6th in Test Automation Tools with 17 reviews. Tricentis Tosca is rated 8.2, while UiPath Test Suite is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Tricentis Tosca writes "Does not require coding experience to use and comes with productivity and time-saving features ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of UiPath Test Suite writes "Can be used by non-developers, and saves us time, but the manual testing needs improvement". Tricentis Tosca is most compared with Katalon Studio, OpenText UFT One, Worksoft Certify, Postman and Informatica Test Data Management (TDM), whereas UiPath Test Suite is most compared with OpenText UFT One, SmartBear TestComplete, Katalon Studio, froglogic Squish and Opkey. See our Tricentis Tosca vs. UiPath Test Suite report.
See our list of best Test Automation Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
