We performed a comparison between SmartBear TestComplete and UiPath Test Suite based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Test Automation Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Test items, project variables helps in managing automation suite and scheduling execution."
"The database checkpoints detect problems which are difficult for a human resource to find."
"The product's initial setup phase was easy."
"The initial setup is pretty easy and it's quick to deploy."
"Complete works perfectly with CUTE. That includes all dialogues, right-click menus, or system dialogues, etc., which are handled well."
"You can record your actions and play them back later."
"The reporting is ready to use and doesn't require any setup."
"The solution is mainly stable."
"It's useful for automating tasks."
"Being able to use regular expressions, activities, and attributes is valuable."
"It is a very scalable product."
"UiPath's most valuable features are reusability and low-code aspects. It works across both desktop and web applications."
"The detailed logging is invaluable."
"Our team used to require five to six days to complete the entire release or execution cycle. Now, we're able to complete it within just one or one and a half days."
"It facilitates the delegation of control to multiple users and offers an efficient way to organize tasks using labels."
"We can generate our own workflow. In our case, it is a report on the PDF file. In the reporting category, we generally verify a couple of things and generate a lot of reports at the end of the day. It provides some useful details about the data captured from the PDF that we can put into an Excel file."
"In scenarios where two of our engineers work on the same task, merging codes is a bit difficult."
"The test object repository needs to be improved. The hierarchy and the way we identify the objects in different applications, irrespective of technology, needs adjustments. The located and test objects are not as flexible compared to other commercial tools."
"Increased performance with less memory and CPU usage."
"TestComplete gives support to do requests to a SOAP web service but has no support to do HTTP requests on Restful services."
"We were testing handheld barcode scanners running WindowsCE with many menus of warehouse functions, and our biggest problem was the timing between input and responses."
"Product is not stable enough and it crashes often."
"Right now, the product only supports Windows."
"It is very hard to read the test log generated by TestComplete Executor if the log file is very big. TestComplete Executor is a small tool for just running the TestComplete test framework (not for developing)."
"We are facing problems specifically with Desk Manager."
"Orchestrator is not easy to use or understand."
"The product releases sometimes have issues."
"Our primary application is built on Windows, so we've faced no significant challenges. However, I think mobile automation is one area where the solution still needs some work."
"The reporting could be improved. Often, we need to email a report to higher management, we can directly get the report from there. Also, the error reporting could be better."
"We'd like to see the solution integrate with more code or local frameworks."
"The test manager component could be improved."
"Storing the test scripts is what needs to improve in the UiPath Test Suite, as it's currently a challenge to some extent. Maintaining the files is a bit challenging, especially when you need to keep those locally."
SmartBear TestComplete is ranked 7th in Test Automation Tools with 72 reviews while UiPath Test Suite is ranked 6th in Test Automation Tools with 17 reviews. SmartBear TestComplete is rated 7.6, while UiPath Test Suite is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of SmartBear TestComplete writes "A stable product that needs to improve its integration capabilities with other test management tools". On the other hand, the top reviewer of UiPath Test Suite writes "Can be used by non-developers, and saves us time, but the manual testing needs improvement". SmartBear TestComplete is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, Katalon Studio, Ranorex Studio, OpenText UFT One and Appium, whereas UiPath Test Suite is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, OpenText UFT One, Katalon Studio, froglogic Squish and Opkey. See our SmartBear TestComplete vs. UiPath Test Suite report.
See our list of best Test Automation Tools vendors.
We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
