We performed a comparison between OpenText UFT One and Visual Studio Test Professional based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Functional Testing Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Object Repository Technology, which is a good mean to identify graphical components of the applications under test."
"It helps in identifying defects earlier. With manual testing, that 15-day timeline meant there were times when we would find defects on the 11th or 12th day of the cycle, but with automation we are able to run the complete suite within a day and we are able to find the failures. It helps us to provide early feedback."
"Hidden among the kitchen sink of features is a new Data Generation tool called the Test Combinations Generator."
"With frequent releases, using automation to perform regression testing can save us huge amount of time and resources."
"This product is easy to use, understand, and maintain."
"The most valuable feature of Micro Focus UFT One is you are able to use it with many other technologies. I have not had an instance where the solution was not able to automate or execute automation. I was able to use COBOL to manage some automation."
"It is easy to automate and new personnel can start learning automation using UFT One. You don't have to learn any scripting."
"Being able to automate different applications makes day-to-day activities a lot easier."
"The debugging feature is valuable."
"The interface is easy to use."
"Visual Studio is highly powerful. It's probably the best software development tool on the market."
"It is a good and user-friendly tool."
"The solution is very stable; there's nothing in relation to stability to complain about."
"It is a very common and strong product. A lot of support is available for this product."
"It is very easy to use. You can handle a lot of things together at once in one package, which is a good point for us."
"The solution is very stable."
"One of the drawbacks is that mobile performance testing is in need of improvement."
"We'd like it to have less scripting."
"The AI feature needs improvement. For banking applications, we input formatted text from documents, but the AI feature is recognizing three fields as one field, e.g., for a phone number, it puts all 10 digits in the international code or country code. Then, the script fails."
"You have to deal with issues such as the firewall and how can the tool talk with the application, i.e., if the application is on a company network and so on. That, of course, is important to figure out."
"It doesn't support Telerik UI controls and we are currently looking for a patch for this."
"Scripting has become more complex from a maintenance standpoint to support additional browsers."
"The artificial intelligence functionality is applicable only on the web, and it should be expanded to cover non-web applications as well."
"It could work with more browsers other than Internet Explorer, and could better handle new things like Ext JS."
"The integration with Git needs improving because it is a bit disjointed and unpredictable."
"The price could be improved."
"The price is reasonable, but it's not the best."
"Visual Studio Test Professional needs to improve its stability."
"The performance could be faster."
"It could be available for multiple platforms and other operating systems like Mac with a native port."
"The database administration could be better; you should be able to choose new tools with the development environment in Visual Studio. It could be easier to use."
"The product must provide more integration."
More Visual Studio Test Professional Pricing and Cost Advice →
OpenText UFT One is ranked 2nd in Functional Testing Tools with 89 reviews while Visual Studio Test Professional is ranked 7th in Functional Testing Tools with 46 reviews. OpenText UFT One is rated 8.0, while Visual Studio Test Professional is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of OpenText UFT One writes "With regularly occurring releases, a QA team member can schedule tests, let the tests run unattended, and then examine the results". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Visual Studio Test Professional writes "Customization is a key feature as is the ability to integrate with third-party services ". OpenText UFT One is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, OpenText UFT Developer, Katalon Studio, SmartBear TestComplete and UiPath Test Suite, whereas Visual Studio Test Professional is most compared with TFS, Apache JMeter, Tricentis NeoLoad, SmartBear TestComplete and Tricentis qTest. See our OpenText UFT One vs. Visual Studio Test Professional report.
See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
