We performed a comparison between SentinelOne Singularity Identity and Tenable Vulnerability Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Vulnerability Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."All the features within the XDR are valuable as a whole for our organization."
"The incident and threat logs are great."
"The most valuable feature of SentinelOne Singularity Identity is its ability to detect based on behavior rather than just static signatures."
"Behind the scenes, SentinelOne has real people who evaluate problems and mark them as false positives. That's what I find most helpful."
"One of the top things we're interested in is cloud protection."
"The XDR capabilities are very good."
"The threat detection capability is the most valuable feature."
"They have different levels of support. We have the highest level where they are constantly checking all the endpoints. If at any certain point, they identify that a computer has been triggered by a virus, a link, or something else, they would automatically tell us that within 15 seconds. If they notice something, they automatically send us an email saying that they noticed something in the computer, and they are going to block it."
"The ease of use in terms of scanning assets is valuable."
"The initial setup is mostly straightforward."
"The vulnerability scanning is the most important aspect of the solution for us."
"The solution is quite friendly."
"The initial setup is pretty straightforward."
"The solution is very simple to use."
"It is a stable solution. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"There is no burden of updating or upgrading this solution."
"SentinelOne Singularity Identity could be more user-friendly."
"The policies could be more precise, and Singularity should use more templates like alternative solutions have. Endpoint management is poor. We cannot manage individual endpoints and must rely on policies, exclusions, or block lists to apply settings to a group instead of the individual agent. If I have to make settings for one computer, I need to create a group, apply the configuration, and move the agent there. It's challenging to manage endpoints that way."
"The root cause of automation could be better."
"A lot of those features came from an acquisition of a different company."
"The solution's query resolution time could be reduced further, and a faster resolution could be provided."
"The primary reason for this discontent is that we frequently encounter performance issues with our servers."
"The UI can be more user-friendly."
"I don't like SentinelOne's reporting tools. Their reports seem fine theoretically, but the issue is the sample size. For example, it will report that there were four incidents, and that equals 25 percent fewer incidents compared to the previous months. It would be a great improvement if I could expand the range to see reports for the last six months, but it's always one month. That would be an easy thing for them to resolve."
"I don't recommend Tenable.io Vulnerability Management for web scanning"
"The stability has room for improvement."
"The solution is a bit slow."
"Another area of improvement is customer service and support. Tenable needs to include support in the pricing/license. Currently, they push clients to get support from partners or channel distributors, who often charge a lot."
"Tenable could improve visibility into assets, including automated asset tagging. You should be able to automatically tag assets based on location, function, ownership, etc. That would help us because we spend a lot of time identifying and tagging assets by hand."
"It would be helpful if Tenable could be more clear with regard to everything the solution can and cannot do with the particular license that you have."
"More flexibility is required compared to other solutions."
"The UI has room for improvement."
More SentinelOne Singularity Identity Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Tenable Vulnerability Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
SentinelOne Singularity Identity is ranked 9th in Vulnerability Management with 14 reviews while Tenable Vulnerability Management is ranked 2nd in Vulnerability Management with 39 reviews. SentinelOne Singularity Identity is rated 8.6, while Tenable Vulnerability Management is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of SentinelOne Singularity Identity writes "It offers deep and continuous visibility into our attack surface". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tenable Vulnerability Management writes "Discovers vulnerabilities and integrates well with other solutions". SentinelOne Singularity Identity is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Identity, Qualys VMDR, Microsoft Defender for Office 365, SailPoint IdentityIQ and Claroty Platform, whereas Tenable Vulnerability Management is most compared with Tenable Security Center, Tenable Nessus, Qualys VMDR, Amazon Inspector and Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management. See our SentinelOne Singularity Identity vs. Tenable Vulnerability Management report.
See our list of best Vulnerability Management vendors.
We monitor all Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.