We performed a comparison between Statseeker and Zabbix based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Network Monitoring Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."We can manage the entire system across the network and troubleshoot the pain points."
"The single dashboard is a valuable feature."
"Device grouping is very easy, and you can discover thousands of devices in a few minutes."
"We were having some issues with a certain site, and it was only Statseeker that showed us what the problem was."
"It also allows us to predict the capacity on WAN circuits, as well as other circuits, to help us plan for upgrading."
"The most important feature for us is the interface statistics, because our customer normally asks us for bandwidth utilization reports. Statseeker has very descriptive transmit and receive information."
"Statseeker helps to quickly see if you have a spike or something going on. In the future, we need to get NetFlow in the tool so we can see what the IP is."
"The most valuable feature is the dashboard, where you have everything right there on the screen."
"I like the fact that I can aggregate multiple interfaces into a single graph. It allows me to quickly the summary of traffic for multiple devices which is helpful."
"The most important feature is just the fact that it doesn't aggregate the information up, and I can look at detailed information going back quite a long time."
"Zabbix can use old data to current data to set the threshold. We can use previous data to set the threshold."
"It not only provides the preconfigured item monitoring feature, but it is also easy to configure custom items."
"They've already added extra features, such as noise-canceling and facial recognition, which is great."
"The flexibility of this solution is amazing."
"Zabbix is good for discovery."
"The calculations part is the most valuable."
"The template system in Zabbix is very beneficial as it saves time in configuration."
"We value the auto-host discovery, template import, bulk import/export features. Newer versions also add nice features, such as multi-IP per host."
"The technical support needs improvement."
"The Wi-Fi side needs improvement."
"That user interface for selecting things needs to be a little more intuitive."
"I would like to see a friendlier user interface in the administration tool."
"Configuration management: In configuration management it would be helpful if it would backup configuration files (running and start-up configuration) for devices. (Not sure if this is already available in the latest version)."
"I would like to see some layer two and layer three topology mappings, similar to what NNMi and SolarWinds presents."
"Technical support for this solution is bad, as is everything with Cisco support."
"Maybe they could provide a little bit more flexibility on creating custom dashboards."
"It doesn't do absolutely everything and it will require some additional software or hardware support to be a complete single solution."
"The interface could be more user-friendly and it would be nice if there were enhanced options for reporting."
"The product delivers false positives during reporting because of flapping. Other reasonably priced alternatives may have better performance."
"The only improvement I would suggest, revolves around its AI and ML capabilities."
"Zabbix is not easy to configure, and upgrading is also an issue."
"The user interface could be a bit better. They could update it a bit."
"There are a lot of areas for improvement, specifically in the dashboards and reports functionalities."
"We would like to see the addition of automatic push functionality to this product. This would save time when monitoring our servers and networks as, at present, we have to manually install the Zabbix agent on any hardware to be monitored."
"There's a small module of APM, however, it is not an enhanced version. People usually ask for a full-fledged APM solution."
"I want Zabbix to improve the UX/UI. Zabbix doesn't use a JavaScript chart for images, and I want them to improve this."
More Juniper Mist Premium Analytics Pricing and Cost Advice →
Statseeker is ranked 64th in Network Monitoring Software with 38 reviews while Zabbix is ranked 1st in Network Monitoring Software with 101 reviews. Statseeker is rated 8.2, while Zabbix is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Statseeker writes "Simplifies monitoring and provides real-time alerts for issues we might not immediately be aware of otherwise". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Zabbix writes "Allows any number of customizations but lacks functionality for finding root causes". Statseeker is most compared with Fortinet FortiSIEM, whereas Zabbix is most compared with Centreon, Checkmk, SolarWinds NPM, Nagios Core and Nagios XI. See our Statseeker vs. Zabbix report.
See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.
We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.