We performed a comparison between SUSE NeuVector and Trend Micro Cloud One based on our users’ reviews in five categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Features: SUSE NeuVector is distinguished by its ISO certification verification and advanced automation. Trend Micro Cloud One offers comprehensive protection against vulnerabilities, login inspection, event tracking, and a bug bounty program. SUSE NeuVector could improve by adding support for scanning IaaS and virtual machines and enhancing its monitoring and reporting capabilities. Users also want better integration with other security solutions and greater visibility into the DevSec pipeline. Trend Micro Cloud One should focus equally focus on AWS and Azure while improving automation and robustness.
Service and Support: Customers are pleased with the technical assistance offered by SUSE NeuVector, finding it helpful, responsive, and knowledgeable. However, there are concerns about the complexity of the support process. Trend Micro Cloud One was highly praised for its customer service and support. Users valued the support team's expertise and liked the round-the-clock availability.
Ease of Deployment: The setup process for SUSE NeuVector can be challenging, depending on the environment and complexity of the project. It may require custom scripts for integration into the pipeline, and more skilled personnel are needed as the complexity increases. Deploying Trend Micro Cloud One can take upwards of a month and requires some development experience. Those with experience consider the deployment to be straightforward, but it typically involves a team of engineers or a small group of people managing the solution.
Pricing: SUSE NeuVector users gave mixed feedback on the pricing, but some users mentioned that large customers can negotiate a better deal. Trend Micro Cloud One's pricing is considered a little high, but users said it falls within the middle range. There may be additional costs depending on the specific use case. The licensing contracts are annual, but there are options for monthly, quarterly, or yearly payments.
ROI: SUSE NeuVector is highly beneficial for industries such as financial services, offering a valuable return on investment. Trend Micro Cloud One stands out for its flexibility and ease of integration.
Comparison Results: Trend Micro Cloud One is the preferred choice over SUSE NeuVector. Users appreciate its comprehensive security features, scalability, and ease of setup. The pricing is considered reasonable, and the payment options are flexible. Trend Micro technical support is highly rated for its knowledge and expertise.
"Support has been very helpful and provides regular feedback and help whenever needed. They've been very useful."
"There's real-time threat detection. It can show threats and find issues based on their severity and helps us with real-time monitoring."
"It's helped free up staff time so that they can work on other projects."
"PingSafe has a dashboard that can detect the criticality of a particular problem, whether it falls under critical, medium, or low vulnerability."
"The UI is responsive and user-friendly."
"The offensive security feature is valuable because it publicly detects the offensive and vulnerable things present in our domain or applications. It checks any applications with public access. Some of the applications give public access to certain files or are present over a particular domain. It detects and lets us know with evidence. That is quite good. It is protecting our infrastructure quite well."
"With PingSafe, it's easy to onboard new accounts."
"We've seen a reduction in resources devoted to vulnerability monitoring. Before PingSafe we spent a lot of time monitoring and fixing these issues. PingSafe enabled us to divert more resources to the production environment."
"The UI has a lot of features."
"When it comes to the price, we got a really good deal from the vendor instantly."
"The most valuable feature of SUSE NeuVector is the performance, deployment, and cost."
"The features of image scanning and anti-malware are really valuable."
"The most valuable feature of SUSE NeuVector is its run-time security."
"The initial setup is quite good, it's straightforward."
"The tool's deployment is simple. Also, I am impressed with its risk capabilities."
"Trend Vision One - Cloud Security's best features are security analysis, remote access security, and driver security."
"The the most valuable feature is the scanning engine. It does not impact server performance. It's very lightweight."
"I really like Trend Vision One - Cloud Security's dashboard."
"I like the conformity and workload security modules. Workload security is all about intrusion detection and prevention. Trend Vision One - Cloud Security has behavioral rules that are auto-populated based on organizational structure. That's one aspect that we liked most."
"The security is good."
"The tech support is excellent. They really know their products. They also know a lot of about the integrations between different solutions."
"Trend Vision One - Cloud Security does not utilize a lot of resources which allows our users to keep working even during a scan."
"The storage and computing features are valuable."
"It took us a while to configure the software to work well in this type of environment, as the support documents were not always clear."
"The main area for improvement I want to see is for the platform to become less resource-intensive. Right now, it can slow down processes on the machine, and it would be a massive improvement if it were more lightweight than it currently is."
"here is a bit of a learning curve. However, you only need two to three days to identify options and get accustomed."
"PingSafe is an excellent CSPM tool, but the CWPP features need to improve, and there is a scope for more application security posture management features. There aren't many ASPM solutions on the market, and existing ones are costly. I would like to see PingSafe develop into a single pane of glass for ASPM, CSPM, and CWPP. Another feature I'd like to see is runtime protection."
"The categorization of the results from the vulnerability assessment could be improved."
"We wanted it to provide us with something like Claroty Hub in AWS for lateral movement. For example, if an EC2 instance or a virtual machine is compromised in a public subnet based on a particular vulnerability, such as Log4j, we want it to not be able to reach some of our databases. This kind of feature is not supported in PingSafe."
"The alerting system of the product is an area that I look at and sometimes get confused about. I feel the alerting feature needs improvement."
"Customized queries should be made easier to improve PingSafe."
"We are also working with IaaS VMS, but NeuVector doesn't support virtual machines."
"SUSE NeuVector should provide more security protection rules and better container image scanning."
"The documentation needs to improve a bit."
"SUSE NeuVector could improve by increasing its visibility into other elements of the DevSecOps pipeline. Additionally, scanning around infrastructure would be helpful."
"I would say that this solution should improve monitoring and reporting. I would also like to see more integrations so that we could essentially make it a part of a developing pipeline."
"The tool should offer seamless integration of other security tools while in a hybrid environment."
"The image-scanning features need improvement."
"Documentation on cloud architecture and job architecture would be helpful."
"The workbook insights generate a massive list, making it inconvenient to review."
"There are also some loopholes because it's a new product that they have recently migrated to the cloud. We do see some issues with the policies we have assigned when it comes to a particular account. There are some issues with system support, such as a particular server kernel version that is not supported."
"The initial setup is easy for someone who operates container platforms on a daily basis. However, it could be difficult for those coming purely from informational security or another field of an IT."
"The product could use a little bit of automation."
"The dashboard should be a bit more intuitive."
"Trend Vision One - Cloud Security should address threats automatically without having user input."
"They should provide a way for users to see violations for specific compliance."
More SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Trend Vision One - Cloud Security Pricing and Cost Advice →
SUSE NeuVector is ranked 19th in Container Security with 7 reviews while Trend Vision One - Cloud Security is ranked 8th in Container Security with 17 reviews. SUSE NeuVector is rated 7.8, while Trend Vision One - Cloud Security is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of SUSE NeuVector writes "Good value for money; great for policy management". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trend Vision One - Cloud Security writes "We can quickly deploy cloud conformity, provides good visibility, and control". SUSE NeuVector is most compared with Sysdig Falco, Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, Aqua Cloud Security Platform, Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes and Sysdig Secure, whereas Trend Vision One - Cloud Security is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Cloud, AWS GuardDuty, Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration and Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks. See our SUSE NeuVector vs. Trend Vision One - Cloud Security report.
See our list of best Container Security vendors and best Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) vendors.
We monitor all Container Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
