We performed a comparison between enable.sc and Trend Micro Cloud One based on our users’ reviews in five categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Features: Tenable.sc has a user-friendly interface and fewer false positives, while Trend Micro Cloud One has good workload management and technical control. Tenable.sc excels in accurate detection, prioritization, and automation, while Trend Micro Cloud One provides excellent virtual patching, login inspection, and container security. Tenable.sc needs to improve its penetration testing, pricing, GUI, reporting, vendor training, and accuracy of vulnerability assessments. On the other hand, Trend Micro Cloud One needs to enhance its pricing, automation, robustness, licensing, marketing documentation, local agent logs, alerts, and flexibility.
Service and Support: Tenable.sc's customer service has received mixed feedback, with users reporting delays and unhelpful information. Meanwhile, Trend Micro Cloud One has received largely positive reviews for their customer service, with customers praising the responsiveness and knowledge of the support team.
Ease of Deployment: Tenable.sc has a simple and uncomplicated initial setup process, which can be completed quickly in just one day. In contrast, Trend Micro Cloud One's setup is more complex and can take anywhere from several hours to a month, depending on the technical expertise and environmental complexity involved. Furthermore, Cloud One necessitates daily monitoring for vulnerabilities and problems.
Pricing: Tenable.sc charges based on the number of IP addresses and has additional costs for advanced support, while some find it reasonable and others consider it expensive. Trend Micro Cloud One's pricing is in the middle range and they offer additional services for a better infrastructure picture. The price has decreased by 25% in recent years.
ROI: Tenable.sc offers cost savings by reducing the need for additional manpower, ensuring a positive return on investment. On the other hand, Trend Micro Cloud One is known for its versatility and seamless integration capabilities.
Comparison Results: Tenable.sc is the preferred option over Trend Micro Cloud One for vulnerability scanning and reporting, according to user reviews. Tenable.sc offers more sophisticated scanning capabilities, timely updates, and fewer false positives than its competitors. While Trend Micro Cloud One is praised for its virtual patching and login inspection features, users have reported high pricing, complex initial setup, and inadequate marketing documentation.
"The tool gives us fewer false positives. Compared to its competitors, the solution’s reports are more accurate."
"We use Tenable to scan all of our environments and plugins for vulnerabilities. Tenable helps us discover network vulnerabilities to threats and piracy."
"The most valuable features of Tenable SC are the reports and the dashboards."
"The scanning part, the agent part – that's the valuable aspect."
"Has a great advanced scanning feature."
"The most valuable feature of the product is the Assurance Report Card, which gives us an overview of the security poster in just a simple glance."
"We really love the Security Center dashboard. It basically performs vulnerability scanning and then outputs a vulnerability data."
"Compared to other products, the most valuable features of the solution are its ease of use and ability to provide visibility over scan results while providing many templates to users, making it a helpful tool."
"It has the best EDR functionality for cloud and typical endpoints."
"The tech support is excellent. They really know their products. They also know a lot of about the integrations between different solutions."
"Detection response and cloud conformity are valuable features."
"The most valuable features are intrusion prevention and anti-malware capabilities."
"Vision One is versatile and can be integrated with many SIEMs. You're not limited to only one SIEM, such as Microsoft Sentinel. The API integrations are seamless, and we have all the documentation needed to integrate Vision One via API."
"The security is good."
"Virtual patching is one of the key features, which is executed with their IPS."
"The perfect package for all security platforms, providing more than any other endpoint solution."
"There's a lot of information being streamed out of the reports. What would be nice, and maybe we just haven't found it, would be more of an executive-type view. We still expect it to collect all this information, but we would like a feature that would allow us to show it to an executive or a director or someone like that and give them some type of high-level overview but not get into the nitty-gritty."
"The pricing is reasonable, but this could be brought down more aggressively, such as we see with Rapid7, Tenable SC's main competitor."
"It's good at creating information, it's good creating dashboards, it's good at creating reports, but if you want to take that reporting metadata and put it into another tool, that is a little bit lacking."
"Tenable SC could be improved with additional connectivity to external company postures and the capability of managing and sustaining agents in the systems directly without additional platforms in the middle."
"Current web page needs improvement, slows down processes."
"For downloading reports, we have to go to the scan and then we have to go to the reports and download the Excel or CSV or PDF. I think these menus and clicks can be minimized."
"Tenable SC could improve by making the creation of the initial reports easier that correspond to our network."
"I think the vendor training provided for Tenable.sc could be a lower price. It's quite expensive for the training."
"The initial setup is easy for someone who operates container platforms on a daily basis. However, it could be difficult for those coming purely from informational security or another field of an IT."
"The dashboard should be a bit more intuitive."
"The pricing can get high."
"The initial setup can be complex for the inexperienced."
"The licensing model could be improved. To gain full coverage, you need to spend more to buy subscriptions for each kind of service they offer. It will start to be pricey if you want full coverage."
"There are also some loopholes because it's a new product that they have recently migrated to the cloud. We do see some issues with the policies we have assigned when it comes to a particular account. There are some issues with system support, such as a particular server kernel version that is not supported."
"One area for improvement in Trend Vision One - Cloud Security is marketing; in particular, Trend Vision should update the marketing documentation. The information needs to be more comprehensive."
"They should provide a way for users to see violations for specific compliance."
More Trend Vision One - Cloud Security Pricing and Cost Advice →
Tenable Security Center is ranked 10th in Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) with 48 reviews while Trend Vision One - Cloud Security is ranked 5th in Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) with 17 reviews. Tenable Security Center is rated 8.2, while Trend Vision One - Cloud Security is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Tenable Security Center writes "A security solution for vulnerability assessment with automated scans". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trend Vision One - Cloud Security writes "We can quickly deploy cloud conformity, provides good visibility, and control". Tenable Security Center is most compared with Tenable Vulnerability Management, Qualys VMDR, Tenable Nessus, Rapid7 InsightVM and Horizon3.ai, whereas Trend Vision One - Cloud Security is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Cloud, AWS GuardDuty, Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration, Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks and Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP. See our Tenable Security Center vs. Trend Vision One - Cloud Security report.
See our list of best Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
