We performed a comparison between Akamai mPulse and Grafana based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Enables dynamic injections from within the product which is great."
"The most valuable feature is the solutions overall performance. It is very efficient and accurate for our usage."
"The most valuable thing was that it had a good visualization tool."
"Grafana's built-in integration with third-party tools, databases, and MQs is an amazing feature."
"It integrates well with other solutions."
"The best thing about Grafana is the visualization. The colors and the ease of use make it very user-friendly."
"Grafana is able to connect with multiple data sources, unlike Elasticsearch."
"The comparison feature is very good."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is the UI dashboard because we need to create a dashboard on Grafana to monitor our data."
"Provides good dashboard visualization."
"In the next release, I would like to see the possibility of sharing the metric from this solution with other solutions."
"The end-to-end distributor tracing connectivity isn't there."
"I had issues with the solution's configuration part."
"Trigger limits are difficult to see in a graph."
"It is limited on the reporting type supported, which is important for managerial-level officers who want reports that are either general or specific."
"I find issues with Grafana. For example, I am unable to open some services there. Then, we have to open ten different tabs to get it fixed. And it's annoying when there's something going on; we want to check Grafana, and it throws four different errors."
"The solution should include online support."
"It would be helpful if Grafana provided more information and training on how to use Prometheus."
"Multiple dashboards combined into one dashboard has slowed things down for us."
"The main drawback is the necessity for endpoint monitoring."
Akamai mPulse is ranked 53rd in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 6 reviews while Grafana is ranked 6th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 39 reviews. Akamai mPulse is rated 6.6, while Grafana is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Akamai mPulse writes "Lacking in regard to observation of the entire platform but does dynamic injections from within". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Grafana writes "Agent-free with great dashboards and an active community". Akamai mPulse is most compared with Dynatrace, New Relic, Datadog, AppDynamics and Sentry, whereas Grafana is most compared with New Relic, Azure Monitor, Sentry, Dynatrace and Elastic Observability. See our Akamai mPulse vs. Grafana report.
See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.