We performed a comparison between Alfabet IT Planning & Portfolio Management and Jira based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Project Portfolio Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The dashboard is the most valuable feature."
"The workflows are very easy to handle as far as scalability goes."
"I feel the strongest feature of Jira is its workflow engine. It helps us automate our workflows within our organization. It's the one characteristic of Jira which I think can help any organization, be it in any domain."
"What I really like about Jira is that it ticks off all the boxes for any agile project. It's easy to set up, easy to use, and it has excellent notification features. Jira is the top choice for anyone working on agile projects like ours."
"Jira has a useful user interface and overall is easy to understand and learn."
"The most valuable feature of Jira is the reporting feature, which allows us to track our team's tasks."
"What I find valuable about Jira is that it's an ecosystem. Sometimes, it does not provide the best in class solutions, but it's so well integrated. You will not have many problems with integration."
"Work management software that has the flexibility to be configured for any company. It's stable, scalable, and offers responsive support."
"I was able to do real-time reports myself without having to wait for data import."
"The user-experience, enhanced performance, and in-hand governance can be improved."
"Performance is something that can always be improved upon in a feature release. Additionally, it would be a benefit to add Markdown in Jira because sometimes it might be better to describe everything in Markdown because it is a common language structure."
"Pretty much 70% - 80% of the Next-Gen Projects features are still to be developed."
"If I'm comparing it to ALM Octane, the documentation is not as robust as ALM Octane's documentation. So, they can improve on the documentation side."
"Stability is an area of concern and it needs improvement, otherwise, it's a good product."
"I would like to have a future-proof idea of the cost and the roadmap for my class."
"I'm mostly focusing on the requirements traceability with my thesis, the integration could improve for other tools. The companies are not only using Jira. For example, for the test cases or for the documents templates, we are using Polarion and we have been having some integration issues."
"I don't know if it's the way it's deployed in the organization, but the interface we are provided is not as customizable as other tools. The multi-language report is not enabled in our installation. I don't really know if it's something related to the tool or our installation."
"It would be ideal if Jira had future functionalities to integrate more easily with various aspects of code reviews."
More Alfabet IT Planning & Portfolio Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
Alfabet IT Planning & Portfolio Management is ranked 14th in Project Portfolio Management with 4 reviews while Jira is ranked 1st in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites with 266 reviews. Alfabet IT Planning & Portfolio Management is rated 7.6, while Jira is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Alfabet IT Planning & Portfolio Management writes "Helps us to implement and understand the status of our projects". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Jira writes "A great centralized tool that has a good agile framework and is useful for day-to-day planning, task management, and work log efficacy". Alfabet IT Planning & Portfolio Management is most compared with ARIS BPA, ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management, LeanIX, Alfabet FastLane and Broadcom Clarity , whereas Jira is most compared with Microsoft Azure DevOps, IBM Rational DOORS, OpenText ALM Octane, Rally Software and Polarion ALM. See our Alfabet IT Planning & Portfolio Management vs. Jira report.
See our list of best Project Portfolio Management vendors.
We monitor all Project Portfolio Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.