Amazon CloudWatch vs Grafana Loki comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Amazon Web Services (AWS) Logo
2,224 views|1,809 comparisons
88% willing to recommend
Grafana Labs Logo
3,809 views|3,379 comparisons
91% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Amazon CloudWatch and Grafana Loki based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Log Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Amazon CloudWatch vs. Grafana Loki Report (Updated: April 2024).
772,679 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The solution effectively monitors golden signals like CPU, page requests, and queues.""We have found the pricing to be reasonable.""Scheduling is a valuable feature.""The alarms are one thing I love about AWS CloudWatch. It has alerts that notify us when resource use is approaching the limit.""Most of it's around optimizing utilization, their cloud utilization. They're making sure that they're getting the most out of their in-cloud environments and their instances. Making sure that there's no strange behavior in the environment.""The most valuable feature of Amazon CloudWatch is its ease of use and logs. You do not have to go to each separate system to see the logs, such as Syslog and they are located in one dashboard GUI.""The monitoring features are valuable.""The most valuable feature of Amazon CloudWatch is collecting the logs from Lambda."

More Amazon CloudWatch Pros →

"The log collection feature is good and the solution is easily understandable. v""The most valuable feature of Grafana Loki is the dashboards which are really simple to create.""The tool can be used in multi-cluster environments.""The most valuable feature of the solution is the tool's GUI. The solution's GUI is very user-friendly.""The most valuable features of the solution stem from the fact that it is an open-source tool that is stable and flexible.""We are using Grafana Loki as a database for real-time metrics.""The effectiveness of filters is pivotal for optimizing the search process and extracting the specific information we need from the extensive log data.""The best feature of Grafana Loki is that it integrates well with our other tool."

More Grafana Loki Pros →

Cons
"The technical support must be improved.""I would like to monitor inbound and outbound transfer. I would also like to control the traffic for load balancing.""Amazon CloudWatch needs improvement. The main thing is we have noticed missing logs.""The solution's pricing is a bit higher.""It's not an advanced way of monitoring.""The product’s documentation must be improved.""The dashboard and the UI could improve in Amazon CloudWatch. Additionally, they should focus on visibility inside the servers with AI and machine learning integrations. This would allow users who are using the solution to see what is happening within the system better.""Right now, in relation to monitoring services, there are too many services and too many metrics per service."

More Amazon CloudWatch Cons →

"The product must improve its UI.""The solution's scalability depends on the team managing the Grafana instance.""Visualization-wise, Grafana Loki's dashboard looks a little outdated compared to other open-source visualization tools like Chronograf.""In Grafana Loki, the creation of metrics is not so easy, making it an area that could be made easier.""We encountered certain limitations when it came to alerting, particularly when dealing with specific data sources.""The Docker container partition feature needs improvement as they do not reuse the space and goes into a pending state.""The correlation of requests is not simple in Grafana Loki and can be improved.""Enhancing speed could be a game-changer, and while it might vary depending on the application, it's a factor worth exploring."

More Grafana Loki Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "We have monthly licensing costs. The licenses are probably in the vicinity of about $300 - $350/month."
  • "Its pricing is reasonable. It is sometimes tricky, but it is reasonable as compared to others."
  • "What's were using is the free service of Amazon CloudWatch, so they're not charging us. As for hidden fees, we're not aware of them because we're using what our clients provided us."
  • "The pricing model is pay-as-you-go so you have to be mindful of usage to manage costs."
  • "Amazon CloudWatch has very cheap pricing, and it hardly costs my company $25-$30 a month for fifty systems, so it's pretty affordable."
  • "The solution is expensive."
  • "The price of Amazon CloudWatch is reasonable for detailed basic monitoring."
  • "The price of Amazon CloudWatch is reasonable. When the rate of data collection is done the price will increase. The price is less than other solutions."
  • More Amazon CloudWatch Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "You can use the free version of Grafana Loki on-premises."
  • "My company doesn't need to pay for the licensing cost of the solution."
  • "We use a free version."
  • "The pricing structure varies based on the number of users; there might be specific taxes to pay for it."
  • "The solution is open source."
  • "I use the solution's open-source version. Grafana Loki is a completely free solution for me."
  • "I use the open-source version of the product."
  • "Grafana Loki is a free, open-source solution."
  • More Grafana Loki Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Log Management solutions are best for your needs.
    772,679 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The monitoring features are valuable.
    Top Answer:CloudWatch doesn’t monitor disk throughput by default. It is part of EC2. If EC2 forwards the logs, then we can do it.
    Top Answer:We are using Grafana Loki as a database for real-time metrics.
    Top Answer:Since we are using the open-source version of Grafana Loki, we are not paying anything for the solution.
    Top Answer:There are a few features in the solution's enterprise version that are not given in the normal basic version. Visualization-wise, Grafana Loki's dashboard looks a little outdated compared to other… more »
    Ranking
    12th
    out of 95 in Log Management
    Views
    2,224
    Comparisons
    1,809
    Reviews
    33
    Average Words per Review
    438
    Rating
    8.2
    13th
    out of 95 in Log Management
    Views
    3,809
    Comparisons
    3,379
    Reviews
    12
    Average Words per Review
    518
    Rating
    8.1
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    Overview

    Amazon CloudWatch is a monitoring and observability service provided by Amazon Web Services (AWS). It allows users to collect and track metrics, collect and monitor log files, and set alarms. With CloudWatch, users can gain insights into their applications, infrastructure, and services, enabling them to make informed decisions and take necessary actions. 

    It provides a unified view of AWS resources and applications, making it easier to troubleshoot issues and optimize performance. CloudWatch offers a range of features including customizable dashboards, automated actions, and integration with other AWS services. 

    The product is a scalable and reliable solution that helps businesses ensure the availability and performance of their applications and infrastructure.

    Grafana Loki is a powerful log aggregation and analysis tool designed for cloud-native environments. Its primary use case is to collect, store, and search logs efficiently, enabling organizations to gain valuable insights from their log data.

    The most valuable functionality of Loki is its ability to scale horizontally, making it suitable for high-volume log data. It achieves this by utilizing a unique indexing approach called "Promtail," which efficiently indexes logs and allows for fast searching and filtering. Loki also supports log streaming in real-time, ensuring that organizations can monitor and analyze logs as they are generated.

    By centralizing logs in a single location, Loki simplifies log management and troubleshooting processes. It provides a unified view of logs from various sources, making it easier to identify and resolve issues quickly. With its powerful query language, organizations can extract meaningful information from logs, enabling them to gain insights into system performance, identify anomalies, and detect potential security threats.

    Loki's integration with Grafana, a popular open-source visualization tool, allows users to create rich dashboards and visualizations based on log data. This combination enhances the observability of systems and applications, enabling organizations to make data-driven decisions and improve overall operational efficiency.

    Sample Customers
    AirAsia, Airbnb, Aircel, APUS, Avazu, Casa & Video, Futbol Club Barcelona (FCBarcelona), National Taiwan University, redBus
    Information Not Available
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm31%
    Healthcare Company13%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Manufacturing Company6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company17%
    Financial Services Firm17%
    Manufacturing Company6%
    Government6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company19%
    Manufacturing Company10%
    Comms Service Provider8%
    Financial Services Firm7%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business35%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise49%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business21%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise64%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise58%
    Large Enterprise17%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business32%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise51%
    Buyer's Guide
    Amazon CloudWatch vs. Grafana Loki
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon CloudWatch vs. Grafana Loki and other solutions. Updated: April 2024.
    772,679 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Amazon CloudWatch is ranked 12th in Log Management with 40 reviews while Grafana Loki is ranked 13th in Log Management with 12 reviews. Amazon CloudWatch is rated 8.0, while Grafana Loki is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Amazon CloudWatch writes "Instantaneous response when monitoring logs and KPIs". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Grafana Loki writes "Effective for Logging, recovery from node failures is fast and single UI supports metrics, logs, and even tracing". Amazon CloudWatch is most compared with Zabbix, Datadog, Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver), Dynatrace and SolarWinds NPM, whereas Grafana Loki is most compared with Graylog, Wazuh, syslog-ng, Splunk Enterprise Security and Fortinet FortiAnalyzer. See our Amazon CloudWatch vs. Grafana Loki report.

    See our list of best Log Management vendors.

    We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.