We performed a comparison between Amazon S3 Glacier and Oracle Database Backup Service based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Public Cloud Storage Services solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution is great for storing data you don't usually need access to. It's also well-integrated with Amazon S3."
"We like that the price is cheaper."
"Amazon S3 Glacier is scalable, flexible, easy to maintain and handle."
"We use the solution for migration."
"AWS does support the ability for user controlled movement of data between regions for business continuance (BC), high availability (HA) and disaster recovery (DR)."
"The pricing is low, and it's dedicated to archiving is valuable to us."
"It is a very comprehensive tool."
"I find Amazon S3 Glacier valuable for storing various documents like purchase orders, standard documents, and drawings."
"The product works very fast. It automates a lot of operations in the background."
"From the database perspective, Oracle is the best."
"Oracle Database Backup Service is an easy-to-use consolidation solution that's dashboard-driven."
"The product's most valuable features are differential and cumulative backup functionality."
"It's a scalable product."
"The backup is reliable and intuitive."
"The interface is good."
"Replication and performance tuning are valuable features."
"The solution's pricing is too expensive and could be improved."
"The pricing is a bit expensive. There is room for improvement in costs."
"The product is difficult to use."
"The technical support has room for improvement."
"Amazon S3 Glacier's data retrieval time is slow compared to other AWS storage services and should be improved."
"The product needs to improve cloud security."
"The solution's dashboard is a bit complicated and could be improved."
"Their pricing structure is always a big topic. It's so difficult to understand."
"We encounter issues while restoring differential and cumulative backups."
"They should base their strategy according to the country and the regulations there, and focus more on the on-premises deployment."
"The product's technical support services need improvement in terms of response time."
"Oracle Database Backup Service is not a cheap solution."
"Deployment is overly complex and could be streamlined."
"The solution needs to add an archive function."
"The product can protect from external data penetration, but the in-house IT team can access it."
"It's already fast, but still, they could improve the speed."
More Oracle Database Backup Service Pricing and Cost Advice →
Amazon S3 Glacier is ranked 2nd in Public Cloud Storage Services with 35 reviews while Oracle Database Backup Service is ranked 13th in Public Cloud Storage Services with 10 reviews. Amazon S3 Glacier is rated 8.6, while Oracle Database Backup Service is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Amazon S3 Glacier writes "A cost-effective solution to reduce storage and cost footprint". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Database Backup Service writes "A backup solution for data storage and restoration with point-in-time recover". Amazon S3 Glacier is most compared with Google Cloud Storage Nearline, Google Cloud Storage, Microsoft Azure File Storage and Wasabi, whereas Oracle Database Backup Service is most compared with Oracle Cloud Object Storage, Microsoft Azure File Storage, Amazon S3 and Amazon EFS (Elastic File System). See our Amazon S3 Glacier vs. Oracle Database Backup Service report.
See our list of best Public Cloud Storage Services vendors.
We monitor all Public Cloud Storage Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
