We performed a comparison between Microsoft Azure File Storage and Oracle Database Backup Service based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Public Cloud Storage Services solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It is very easy to use SSTP and some traditional code to move the data into a database because we can easily use the permissions and we don't have any integration or conversion issues."
"The immutable storage features are valuable."
"The most significant aspect of Microsoft Azure File Storage is its life cycle functionality, which enables us to transfer files to various storage options, such as hot storage, full storage, and archive. This feature is crucial since we can apply a life cycle method to files that have not been in use for an extended period, and then move them to a cheaper cold storage option to save costs. Since the newest files are stored in the hot storage, it met our specific requirements. Consequently, older files can be transferred to archive and cold storage."
"It was quick to synchronize back from Azure to the on-premise server."
"The product is a reliable cloud solution."
"The storage in this solution is excellent."
"It is a scalable product since it is a cloud solution. Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"The solution is easy to use."
"The backup is reliable and intuitive."
"It's a scalable product."
"From the database perspective, Oracle is the best."
"The product works very fast. It automates a lot of operations in the background."
"Oracle Database Backup Service is an easy-to-use consolidation solution that's dashboard-driven."
"The interface is good."
"Replication and performance tuning are valuable features."
"The product's most valuable features are differential and cumulative backup functionality."
"It's a bit complex to set up. Other than that, there is nothing to improve."
"It’s a challenge to find the right support person."
"It's not very intuitive."
"In our use cases, we see the weakness in mobile internet connectivity."
"The way retention policies are applied could be more optimized."
"The pricing and technical support could be better."
"The initial setup is complex. Unless you have done it a few times it, it is going to be hard."
"The pricing could be improved. They need to make the costs more transparent so users know what they will be charged and why ahead of time."
"The product can protect from external data penetration, but the in-house IT team can access it."
"They should base their strategy according to the country and the regulations there, and focus more on the on-premises deployment."
"Oracle Database Backup Service is not a cheap solution."
"Deployment is overly complex and could be streamlined."
"The solution needs to add an archive function."
"We encounter issues while restoring differential and cumulative backups."
"We cannot use the product with other brands."
"It's already fast, but still, they could improve the speed."
More Oracle Database Backup Service Pricing and Cost Advice →
Microsoft Azure File Storage is ranked 3rd in Public Cloud Storage Services with 44 reviews while Oracle Database Backup Service is ranked 13th in Public Cloud Storage Services with 10 reviews. Microsoft Azure File Storage is rated 8.2, while Oracle Database Backup Service is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Microsoft Azure File Storage writes "Various storage options available, high availability, and quick deployment". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Database Backup Service writes "A backup solution for data storage and restoration with point-in-time recover". Microsoft Azure File Storage is most compared with Amazon EFS (Elastic File System), Azure NetApp Files, Wasabi, Amazon S3 and Nutanix Unified Storage, whereas Oracle Database Backup Service is most compared with Oracle Cloud Object Storage, Amazon S3, Amazon EFS (Elastic File System), Wasabi and Amazon S3 Glacier. See our Microsoft Azure File Storage vs. Oracle Database Backup Service report.
See our list of best Public Cloud Storage Services vendors.
We monitor all Public Cloud Storage Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
